Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 604

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ALK Rearrangements Are Mutually Exclusive with Mutations in EGFR or KRAS: An Analysis of 1,683 Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Open access
Gainor, Justin F., Varghese, Anna M., Ou, Sai-Hong Ignatius, Kabraji, Sheheryar, Awad, Mark M., Katayama, Ryohei, Pawlak, Amanda, Mino-Kenudson, Mari, Yeap, Beow Y., Riely, Gregory J., Iafrate, A. John, Arcila, Maria E., Ladanyi, Marc, Engelman, Jeffrey A., Dias-Santagata, Dora, Shaw, Alice T.·2013·Clinical Cancer Research

Abstract

Purpose: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements define a distinct molecular subset of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, several case reports and small series have reported that ALK rearrangements can overlap with other oncogenic drivers in NSCLC in crizotinib-naïve and crizotinib-resistant cancers. Experimental Design: We reviewed clinical genotyping data from 1,683 patients with NSCLC and investigated the prevalence of concomitant EGFR or KRAS mutations among patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. We also examined biopsy specimens from 34 patients with ALK-positive NSCLC after the development of resistance to crizotinib. Results: Screening identified 301 (17.8%) EGFR mutations, 465 (27.6%) KRAS mutations, and 75 (4.4%) ALK rearrangements. EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements were mutually exclusive. Four patients with KRAS mutations were found to have abnormal ALK FISH patterns, most commonly involving isolated 5′ green probes. Sufficient tissue was available for confirmatory ALK immunohistochemistry in 3 cases, all of which were negative for ALK expression. Among patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who acquired resistance to crizotinib, repeat biopsy specimens were ALK FISH positive in 29 of 29 (100%) cases. Secondary mutations in the ALK kinase domain and ALK gene amplification were observed in 7 of 34 (20.6%) and 3 of 29 (10.3%) cases, respectively. No EGFR or KRAS mutations were identified among any of the 25 crizotinib-resistant, ALK-positive patients with sufficient tissue for testing. Conclusions: Functional ALK rearrangements were mutually exclusive with EGFR and KRAS mutations in a large Western patient population. This lack of overlap was also observed in ALK-positive cancers with acquired resistance to crizotinib. Clin Cancer Res; 19(15); 4273–81. ©2013 AACR.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-0318

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 604

Metadata

Authors
Gainor, J. F., Varghese, A. M., Ou, S.-H. I., Kabraji, S., Awad, M. M., Katayama, R., Pawlak, A., Mino-Kenudson, M., Yeap, B. Y., Riely, G. J., Iafrate, A. J., Arcila, M. E., Ladanyi, M., Engelman, J. A., Dias-Santagata, D., & Shaw, A. T.
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2013-07-31
Volume
19
Issue
15
Pages
4273-4281
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2172010139
Cited by
604
References
3
FWCI
42.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ALK Rearrangements Are Mutually Exclusive with Mutations in EGFR or KRAS: An Analysis of 1,683 Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-0318
The paper
Gainor, J. F., Varghese, A. M., Ou, S.-H. I., Kabraji, S., Awad, M. M., Katayama, R., Pawlak, A., Mino-Kenudson, M., Yeap, B. Y., Riely, G. J., Iafrate, A. J., Arcila, M. E., Ladanyi, M., Engelman, J. A., Dias-Santagata, D., & Shaw, A. T. (2013). ALK Rearrangements Are Mutually Exclusive with Mutations in EGFR or KRAS: An Analysis of 1,683 Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clinical Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-0318

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.