Cited by 980Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Research StudiesLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Brigatinib versus Crizotinib in ALK -Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Open access
Camidge, D. Ross, Kim, Hye Ryun, Ahn, Myung-Ju, Yang, James Chih-Hsin, Han, Ji-Youn, Lee, Jong-Seok, Hochmair, Maximilian J., Li, Jacky Yu-Chung +19 more·2018·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Brigatinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, has robust efficacy in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is refractory to crizotinib. The efficacy of brigatinib, as compared with crizotinib, in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC who have not previously received an ALK inhibitor is unclear. METHODS: In an open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC who had not previously received ALK inhibitors to receive brigatinib at a dose of 180 mg once daily (with a 7-day lead-in period at 90 mg) or crizotinib at a dose of 250 mg twice daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included the objective response rate and intracranial response. The first interim analysis was planned when approximately 50% of 198 expected events of disease progression or death had occurred. RESULTS: A total of 275 patients underwent randomization; 137 were assigned to brigatinib and 138 to crizotinib. At the first interim analysis (99 events), the median follow-up was 11.0 months in the brigatinib group and 9.3 months in the crizotinib group. The rate of progression-free survival was higher with brigatinib than with crizotinib (estimated 12-month progression-free survival, 67% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 56 to 75] vs. 43% [95% CI, 32 to 53]; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.33 to 0.74]; P<0.001 by the log-rank test). The confirmed objective response rate was 71% (95% CI, 62 to 78) with brigatinib and 60% (95% CI, 51 to 68) with crizotinib; the confirmed rate of intracranial response among patients with measurable lesions was 78% (95% CI, 52 to 94) and 29% (95% CI, 11 to 52), respectively. No new safety concerns were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who had not previously received an ALK inhibitor, progression-free survival was significantly longer among patients who received brigatinib than among those who received crizotinib. (Funded by Ariad Pharmaceuticals; ALTA-1L ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02737501 .).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1810171

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The low frequency of co-drivers plus marked dependence on the ALK fusion protein could account for prolonged PFS seen with second- and third-generation ALK inhibitors.

    “both the rarity of co-drivers and strong addiction to the ALK fusion oncoprotein may account for the long progression-free survival observed in patients with ALK-rearrangements with the potent and selective second and third generation ALK inhibitors alectinib, brigatinib and lorlatinib23, 26, 27.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Camidge, D. R., Kim, H. R., Ahn, M.-J., Yang, J. C.-H., Han, J.-Y., Lee, J.-S., Hochmair, M. J., Li, J. Y.-C., Chang, G.-C., Lee, K. H., Gridelli, C., Delmonte, A., Garcia Campelo, R., Kim, D.-W., Bearz, A., Griesinger, F., Morabito, A., Felip, E., Califano, R., Ghosh, S., Spira, A., Gettinger, S. N., Tiseo, M., Gupta, N., Haney, J., Kerstein, D., & Popat, S.
Affiliations
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Chungbuk National University (KR)
  • From the University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora (D.R.C.); Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine (H.R.K.), Samsung Medical Center (M.-J.A.), and Seoul National University Hospital (D.-W.K.), Seoul, National Cancer Center, Goyang (J.-Y.H.), Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam (J.-S.L.), and Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju (K.H.L.)...
  • Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2018-11-22
Volume
379
Issue
21
Pages
2027-2039
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2894476389
Cited by
980
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 108 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 122 · 2022: 138 · 2021: 163 · 2020: 150 · 2019: 107 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 1
FWCI
81.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
brigatinib, crizotinib, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer, ALK inhibitors, progression-free survival, objective response rate, intracranial response, first-line therapy, brain metastases, head-to-head comparison, targeted therapy, ALK rearrangement
MeSH terms
Crizotinib, Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase, Progression-Free Survival, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Brain Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Organophosphorus Compounds, Pyrimidines, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review