Cited by 1,136BRCA gene mutations in cancerBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesPARP inhibition in cancer therapy

Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) Score Predicts Response to Platinum-Containing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Open access
Telli, Melinda L., Timms, Kirsten M., Reid, Julia, Hennessy, Bryan, Mills, Gordon B., Jensen, Kristin C., Szallasi, Zoltan, Barry, William T. +17 more·2016·Clinical Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: BRCA1/2-mutated and some sporadic triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) have DNA repair defects and are sensitive to DNA-damaging therapeutics. Recently, three independent DNA-based measures of genomic instability were developed on the basis of loss of heterozygosity (LOH), telomeric allelic imbalance (TAI), and large-scale state transitions (LST). Experimental Design: We assessed a combined homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score, an unweighted sum of LOH, TAI, and LST scores, in three neoadjuvant TNBC trials of platinum-containing therapy. We then tested the association of HR deficiency, defined as HRD score ≥42 or BRCA1/2 mutation, with response to platinum-based therapy. Results: In a trial of neoadjuvant platinum, gemcitabine, and iniparib, HR deficiency predicted residual cancer burden score of 0 or I (RCB 0/I) and pathologic complete response (pCR; OR = 4.96, P = 0.0036; OR = 6.52, P = 0.0058). HR deficiency remained a significant predictor of RCB 0/I when adjusted for clinical variables (OR = 5.86, P = 0.012). In two other trials of neoadjuvant cisplatin therapy, HR deficiency predicted RCB 0/I and pCR (OR = 10.18, P = 0.0011; OR = 17.00, P = 0.0066). In a multivariable model of RCB 0/I, HR deficiency retained significance when clinical variables were included (OR = 12.08, P = 0.0017). When restricted to BRCA1/2 nonmutated tumors, response was higher in patients with high HRD scores: RCB 0/I P = 0.062, pCR P = 0.063 in the neoadjuvant platinum, gemcitabine, and iniparib trial; RCB 0/I P = 0.0039, pCR P = 0.018 in the neoadjuvant cisplatin trials. Conclusions: HR deficiency identifies TNBC tumors, including BRCA1/2 nonmutated tumors more likely to respond to platinum-containing therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 22(15); 3764–73. ©2016 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2477

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Expression-based profiling and Integrative Clusters cannot adequately discriminate HRDetect groups, suggesting HRDetect provides a novel independent angle to TNBC stratification.

    “expression-based profiling (e.g., PAM50) and Integrative Clusters13,15 are not adequately able to discriminate HRDetect groups, suggesting that HRDetect provides a novel, independent angle to TNBC stratification.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Telli, M. L., Timms, K. M., Reid, J., Hennessy, B., Mills, G. B., Jensen, K. C., Szallasi, Z., Barry, W. T., Winer, E. P., Tung, N. M., Isakoff, S. J., Ryan, P. D., Greene-Colozzi, A., Gutin, A., Sangale, Z., Iliev, D., Neff, C., Abkevich, V., Jones, J. T., Lanchbury, J. S., Hartman, A.-R., Garber, J. E., Ford, J. M., Silver, D. P., & Richardson, A. L.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Myriad Genetics (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • 4Denmark Technical University, Lyngby, Denmark.
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Silver, Daniel P.
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2016-07-31
Volume
22
Issue
15
Pages
3764-3773
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2295085830
Cited by
1,136
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 97 · 2025: 118 · 2024: 140 · 2023: 159 · 2022: 170 · 2021: 151 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 19
FWCI
55.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF15OC0016584, NNF14OC0009569)
  • National Cancer Institute (P50CA089393, P50CA083639, P50CA168504)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Keywords
homologous recombination deficiency, triple-negative breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, platinum-based chemotherapy, BRCA mutations, loss of heterozygosity, telomeric allelic imbalance, large-scale state transitions, genomic instability, predictive biomarkers, pathological complete response, residual cancer burden, iniparib, cisplatin, gemcitabine, DNA repair
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Female, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasm Staging, Platinum, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Tumor, Odds Ratio, Telomere, Treatment Outcome, Genes, BRCA1, Loss of Heterozygosity, Allelic Imbalance, Genes, BRCA2, Homologous Recombination, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review