Cited by 138PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies

PI3K inhibition reduces mammary tumor growth and facilitates antitumor immunity and anti-PD1 responses

Open access
Sai, Jiqing, Owens, Philip, Novitskiy, Sergey V., Hawkins, Oriana E., Vilgelm, Anna E., Yang, Jinming, Sobolik, Tammy, Lavender, Nicole +9 more·2017·Clinical Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Metastatic breast cancers continue to elude current therapeutic strategies, including those utilizing PI3K inhibitors. Given the prominent role of PI3Kα,β in tumor growth and PI3Kγ,δ in immune cell function, we sought to determine whether PI3K inhibition altered antitumor immunity. Experimental Design: The effect of PI3K inhibition on tumor growth, metastasis, and antitumor immune response was characterized in mouse models utilizing orthotopic implants of 4T1 or PyMT mammary tumors into syngeneic or PI3Kγ-null mice, and patient-derived breast cancer xenografts in humanized mice. Tumor-infiltrating leukocytes were characterized by IHC and FACS analysis in BKM120 (30 mg/kg, every day) or vehicle-treated mice and PI3Kγnull versus PI3KγWT mice. On the basis of the finding that PI3K inhibition resulted in a more inflammatory tumor leukocyte infiltrate, the therapeutic efficacy of BKM120 (30 mg/kg, every day) and anti-PD1 (100 μg, twice weekly) was evaluated in PyMT tumor–bearing mice. Results: Our findings show that PI3K activity facilitates tumor growth and surprisingly restrains tumor immune surveillance. These activities could be partially suppressed by BKM120 or by genetic deletion of PI3Kγ in the host. The antitumor effect of PI3Kγ loss in host, but not tumor, was partially reversed by CD8+ T-cell depletion. Treatment with therapeutic doses of both BKM120 and antibody to PD-1 resulted in consistent inhibition of tumor growth compared with either agent alone. Conclusions: PI3K inhibition slows tumor growth, enhances antitumor immunity, and heightens susceptibility to immune checkpoint inhibitors. We propose that combining PI3K inhibition with anti-PD1 may be a viable therapeutic approach for triple-negative breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 23(13); 3371–84. ©2016 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-2142

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deletion of Pik3cg in the host enables superior CD8+ CTL functions.

    “phosphatidylinositol4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit gamma ( Pik3cg ) deletion in the host enables superior CD8 + CTL functions”

    From Immunomodulation by targeted anticancer agents (2021) · cites this paper as Sai et al., 2017

  • The pan-class I PI3K inhibitor buparlisib synergizes with PD-1 blockers in controlling mouse breast cancers in immunocompetent hosts.

    “the pan-class I PI3K inhibitor buparlisib synergizes with PD-1 blockers in the control of mouse breast cancers established in immunocompetent hosts (Sai et al., 2017)”

    From Immunomodulation by targeted anticancer agents (2021) · cites this paper as Sai et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 138

Authors
Sai, J., Owens, P., Novitskiy, S. V., Hawkins, O. E., Vilgelm, A. E., Yang, J., Sobolik, T., Lavender, N., Johnson, A. C., McClain, C., Ayers, G. D., Kelley, M. C., Sanders, M., Mayer, I. A., Moses, H. L., Boothby, M., & Richmond, A.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Richmond, Ann
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2017-07-01
Volume
23
Issue
13
Pages
3371-3384
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2564136012
Cited by
138
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • VA Senior Research Career Scientist Award (CA34590)
  • VICC Cancer Center Support Grant (P30CA068485)
  • NIH (5T32 CA119925, 1F32CA171895, T32CA171895-01, K12-CA090625, ACS- PF-11-092-01-CSM)
  • VA CDA2 (IK2-BX002929)
  • CTSA NIH (UL1TR000445)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Keywords
PI3K inhibition, PI3Kγ, BKM120, anti-PD-1 therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, antitumor immunity, mammary tumors, triple-negative breast cancer, tumor-infiltrating leukocytes, CD8+ T cells, tumor growth, metastasis, PyMT mice, 4T1 cells, combination therapy
MeSH terms
Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase Inhibitors, Aminopyridines, Animals, Female, Humans, Immunity, Cellular, Morpholines, Neoplasm Metastasis, Signal Transduction, Mammary Neoplasms, Animal, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Cell Line, Tumor, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Class Ib Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review