Cited by 212Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesImmune cells in cancer

Immunomodulation by targeted anticancer agents

Open access
Petroni, Giulia, Buqué, Aitziber, Zitvogel, Laurence, Kroemer, Guido, Galluzzi, Lorenzo·2021·Cancer Cell

Abstract

At odds with conventional chemotherapeutics, targeted anticancer agents are designed to inhibit precise molecular alterations that support oncogenesis or tumor progression. Despite such an elevated degree of molecular specificity, many clinically employed and experimental targeted anticancer agents also mediate immunostimulatory or immunosuppressive effects that (at least in some settings) influence therapeutic efficacy. Here, we discuss the main immunomodulatory effects of targeted anticancer agents and explore potential avenues to harness them in support of superior clinical efficacy.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that targeted anticancer agents, despite being designed for molecular specificity, frequently modulate immune responses in ways that can either support or undermine therapeutic efficacy. It catalogs these immunostimulatory and immunosuppressive effects across major drug classes and proposes combining targeted agents with immune checkpoint inhibitors and other immunotherapies.

Key findings

Many targeted agents mediate net immunostimulation through improved antigen presentation, pro-inflammatory cytokine release, immunogenic cell death, NK-cell activation, or depletion of regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells; examples span CDK4/6 inhibitors, BRAF/MEK inhibitors, PARP inhibitors, EGFR/HER2-targeting antibodies, and VEGFA/TGFβ inhibitors. Conversely, the same classes can also drive immunosuppression, often via PD-L1 upregulation, T-cell exhaustion, M2-like macrophage polarization, or MDSC expansion, which provides a rationale for combining them with ICIs. The review notes that ICIs used alone produce durable responses in only about 15%–30% of patients depending on the oncological setting, while seven ICIs are approved by the FDA or equivalent agencies. It also suggests that clinical development may have positively selected targeted agents with net immunostimulatory activity, and that future development should incorporate immune-cell/cancer-cell co-culture screens, immunocompetent mouse models, and immunomonitoring starting in phase I trials.

Methods

Narrative review; no primary experiments, systematic search strategy, or meta-analysis are described. The authors synthesize preclinical and clinical literature and provide five tables mapping targets, agents, FDA approval status, cancer-cell-dependent versus immune-cell-dependent effects, notes, and references. The synthesis is organized thematically by drug class: CDK inhibitors, KRAS/PI3K signaling inhibitors, DDR- and apoptosis-targeting agents, HER2/EGFR/VEGFA/TGFβ inhibitors, and other targeted agents.

Limitations

Stated in the paper: the authors apologize for omitting high-profile articles because of space constraints, and they note that the biology of immunomodulation by targeted agents is still emerging, with unresolved questions about drug specificity, mechanisms, divergent effects across settings, and optimal combinatorial schedules. Evident from the text: this is a narrative review without a systematic search or quantitative synthesis; many cited findings are preclinical or context-dependent; the tables mix approved and experimental agents without formal risk-of-bias assessment; and the proposed combinatorial strategies are not validated by primary data in the review itself.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.11.009

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 378 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation
    § INTRODUCTION · p. 1

    Imatinib's clinical activity has a link to immune functions.

    “an unexpected link between the clinical activity of imatinib and immune functions emerged (Zitvogel et al., 2016)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zitvogel et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation
    § Box 1. ICD in cancer therapy · p. 2

    Targeted anticancer agents can induce an immunogenic form of cancer cell death that initiates the cancer-immunity cycle.

    “targeted anticancer agents can trigger a highly immunogenic variant of cancer cell death to jumpstart the so-called cancer-immunity cycle (Galluzzi et al., 2017b)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Galluzzi et al., 2017b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation
    § Box 1. ICD in cancer therapy · p. 2

    Most targeted anticancer drugs currently approved for patient use produce at least some therapeutically relevant immune stimulation.

    “most targeted anticancer agents currently approved for use in patients mediate (at least some degree of) therapeutically relevant immunostimulation”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Galluzzi et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationnone given
    § SUMMARY · p. 1

    A broad set of targeted anticancer drugs, both approved and experimental, produce immune-stimulating or immune-suppressing effects that can affect how well treatment works in certain contexts.

    “Despite such an elevated degree of molecular specificity, many clinically employed and experimental targeted anticancer agents also mediate immunostimulatory or immunosuppressive effects that (at least in some settings) influence therapeutic efficacy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationnone given
    § INTRODUCTION · p. 1

    Imatinib and nearly all other targeted anticancer agents developed over the past three decades exert immune-stimulating or immune-suppressing effects that can affect treatment efficacy.

    “A large amount of preclinical and clinical data indicates that imatinib and virtually all other targeted anticancer agents developed over the past three decades indeed exert”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 96
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 11
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 6
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Box 1. ICD in cancer therapy · p. 2

    Preclinical tumor models show that various clinically relevant anticancer treatments-conventional chemotherapy, radiation, and targeted agents-can trigger bona fide ICD and start the cancer-immunity cycle.

    “a variety of clinically relevant anticancer interventions including conventional chemotherapeutics (Galluzzi et al., 2020a), radiation therapy (RT) (Rodriguez-Ruiz et al., 2020), and targeted anticancer agents (see main text) have been shown to elicit bona fide ICD and hence jumpstart the cancer-immunity cycle (Chen and Mellman, 2017) in preclinical tumor models.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Galluzzi et al., 2020a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rodriguez-Ruiz et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Chen and Mellman, 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § Box 1. ICD in cancer therapy · p. 2

    Targeted anticancer agents can yield net immune stimulation by increasing pro-inflammatory cytokine release or by reducing immunosuppressive factors.

    “targeted anticancer agents can mediate net immunostimulatory effects by promoting the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, or by limiting the release or activity of immunosuppressive factors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Box 1. ICD in cancer therapy · p. 2

    Targeted anticancer drugs can modulate immunity through interactions with cancer cells or with immune cells.

    “The immunomodulatory activity of targeted anticancer agents can originate from the interaction of the drug with cancer cells, as well as from the ability of the drug to interact with, and alter the function of, immune cells (Galluzzi et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Galluzzi et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Box 1. ICD in cancer therapy · p. 2

    The ability of targeted anticancer agents to modulate immunity justifies developing combinations with immunotherapy.

    “the capacity of targeted anticancer agents to mediate immunomodulatory effects provides a strong rationale to develop combinatorial regimens involving immunotherapy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 6

    In that HER2+ model, ICIs do not improve targeted therapy efficacy unless cabozantinib is added, which creates a TME dominated by immune effector cells rather than MDSCs.

    “ICIs fail to improve the efficacy of targeted anticancer agents, unless combined with the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) cabozantinib, resulting in the establishment of a tumor microenvironment (TME) dominated by immune effector cells (rather than MDSCs)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al., 2019a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § ll · p. 6

    CDK7 inhibition in mice with syngeneic lung cancers increases immune effector cell infiltration and can be combined successfully with PD-1-targeting ICIs.

    “CDK7 inhibition in mice bearing syngeneic lung cancers promotes tumor infiltration by immune effector cells and can be successfully combined with ICIs targeting PD-1 (Wang et al., 2020b; Zhang et al., 2020a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al., 2020b

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Zhang et al., 2020a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § ll · p. 6

    Dinaciclib induces ICD and type I IFN signaling in mouse colorectal cancer models, promoting dendritic cell activation and CD8+ T-cell recruitment that can be exploited with PD-1-specific ICIs.

    “dinaciclib promotes immunogenic cell death (ICD) along with robust type I IFN signaling (and despite PD-L1 upregulation in this setting) in mouse models of colorectal cancer (CRC), ultimately favoring dendritic cell (DC) activation and recruitment of CD8 + T cells that can be actioned with ICIs specific for PD-1”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hossain et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § KRAS AND PI3K SIGNALING INHIBITORS · p. 6

    Many human tumors are driven by gain-of-function mutations in KRAS, PIK3CA, or BRAF, or by PTEN deletions, causing constitutive mitogenic signaling through AKT1 and MTOR or MEK.

    “Several human tumors are driven by gain-of-function mutations in KRAS , PI3KCA , or B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase ( BRAF ), as well as by phosphatase and tensin homolog ( PTEN ) deletions”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hoxhaj and Manning, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Moore et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Cell · p. 3

    This cytokine secretion occurs either after endogenous retrovirus derepression and nucleic acid sensing or after permanent cell cycle blockage with a senescence-associated secretory phenotype.

    “This occurs either upon the derepression of endogenous retroviruses and consequent nucleic acid sensing (Goel et al., 2017; Vanpouille-Box et al., 2019) or following the establishment of a permanent cell cycle blockage (i.e., cellular senescence) characterized by an abundant secretory component, the so-called senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) (Jerby-Arnon et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Goel et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Vanpouille-Box et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Jerby-Arnon et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § KRAS AND PI3K SIGNALING INHIBITORS · p. 6

    BRAF, PI3K, MTOR, and MEK inhibitors have become FDA-approved targeted anticancer agents, while KRAS inhibitors are not yet licensed and AKT1 inhibitors are in early development.

    “while BRAF, PI3K, MTOR, and MEK inhibitors have been successfully developed into FDA-approved targeted anticancer agents, KRAS inhibitors have not yet been licensed for use in humans, and the development of AKT1 inhibitors is in its infancy”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hoxhaj and Manning, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Moore et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 6

    Deleting Cdk8 in NK cells improves effector functions and gives robust control of syngeneic melanomas, lymphomas, and leukemias.

    “deletion of Cdk8 in NK cells results in superior effector functions coupled to robust control of syngeneic melanomas, lymphomas, and leukemias (Witalisz-Siepracka et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Witalisz-Siepracka et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE INHIBITORS · p. 2

    CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors and other CDK inhibitors both halt malignant cell proliferation and produce multiple immunomodulatory effects.

    “Accumulating evidence suggests that CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors, as well as inhibitors of other CDKs, do not only arrest the proliferation of malignant cells, they also mediate multipronged immunomodulatory effects (Klein et al., 2018; Petroni et al., 2020)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Klein et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Petroni et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 6

    This enhanced antigen presentation correlates with better disease control, depletion of TREG cells and MDSCs, and added benefit from ICIs.

    “correlating with (1) superior disease control in vivo , along with the systemic depletion of immunosuppressive cells including TREG cells and myeloidderived suppressor cells (MDSCs), as well as (2) added therapeutic benefits from ICIs”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Teo et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Whittle et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 6

    CDK7 inhibition in lung cancer cells promotes genomic instability linked to secretion of TH1 cytokines such as TNF, CXCL9, and CXCL10, and lowers PD-L1 via p38 and MYCN repression.

    “Pharmacological inhibition of CDK7 in lung cancer cells promotes genomic instability linked to the secretion of T-helper 1 (TH1) cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF), chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 9 (CXCL9), and CXCL10”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al., 2020b

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Zhang et al., 2020a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Review Cell · p. 11

    Prebiotics that boost general immune tonus, such as inulin, can avoid or reverse the detrimental effect of MEK inhibition.

    “(4) prebiotics that boost general immune tonus, such as inulin (Li et al., 2020b)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Li et al., 2020b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § KRAS AND PI3K SIGNALING INHIBITORS · p. 6

    Many KRAS/PI3K pathway inhibitors both limit mitogenic signaling in cancer cells and produce therapeutically relevant immunomodulatory effects.

    “Interestingly, many of these agents not only limit mitogenic signaling in cancer cells but also mediate a panel of therapeutically relevant immunomodulatory effects (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Table 2

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § ll · p. 11

    PD-1+ melanoma cells that appear after BRAF/MEK co-inhibition have limited proliferative capacity and increased stemness features, and may be a major source of chemoresistance.

    “PD-1 + melanoma cells emerging upon BRAF/MEK co-inhibition display limited proliferative potential and increased stemness features, potentially constituting the major source of chemoresistance (Sanlorenzo et al., 2018)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sanlorenzo et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § ll · p. 11

    In tumors treated with BRAF or MEK inhibitors, the tumor microenvironment contains more T cells that express IFNG and CD40LG, but fewer MDSCs and immunosuppressive TAMs.

    “the TME of tumors treated with BRAF or MEK inhibitors is enriched in T cells expressing IFNG and the immunostimulatory receptor CD40 ligand (CD40LG) (Ho et al., 2014) but depleted of MDSCs and immunosuppressive tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) (Allegrezza et al., 2016a; Baumann et al., 2020; Poon et al., 2017)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ho et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Allegrezza et al., 2016a

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Baumann et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 11

    PTEN deletion in triple-negative breast cancer cell lines increases PD-L1 expression, which can be reversed by AKT1 or MTOR inhibition and by PI3Kα inhibition together with CDK4/CDK6 blockage.

    “PTEN deletion in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell lines promotes PD-L1 upregulation, which can be reverted by AKT1 or MTOR inhibition (Mittendorf et al., 2014) as well as by PI3K a inhibition in the context of CDK4/CDK6 blockage (Teo et al., 2017)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Mittendorf et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Teo et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § ll · p. 11

    PD-1 or PD-L1 blockers and immunostimulatory antibodies against OX40 or 4-1BB enhance the therapeutic activity of MEK inhibition in vivo in syngeneic immunocompetent models.

    “the ability of PD-1 or PD-L1 blockers (Liu et al., 2015; Loi et al., 2016) as well as immunostimulatory antibodies targeting TNF receptor superfamily member 4 (TNFRSF4, best known as OX40) or TNFRSF9 (best known as 4-1BB) (Dushyanthen et al., 2017) to improve the therapeutic activity of MEK inhibition in vivo , in syngeneic immunocompetent settings”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Liu et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Loi et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Dushyanthen et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § ll · p. 11

    Vemurafenib lowers the surface expression of several NK-cell-activating ligands on malignant cells, which mediates immunosuppressive effects.

    “vemurafenib downregulates the expression of various NK-cell-activating ligands (NKALs) on the surface of malignant cells, hence mediating immunosuppressive effects (Lo ´ pez-Cobo et al., 2018)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lo ´ pez-Cobo et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § ll · p. 11

    MEK signaling is important for expanding naive T cells during priming and for protecting tumor-infiltrating CD8+ CTLs from death caused by chronic TCR stimulation.

    “this reflects the key role of MEK signaling in the expansion of naive T cells at priming, as well as in the protection of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + CTLs from the lethal consequences of chronic TCR stimulation (Boni et al., 2010; Ebert et al., 2016)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Boni et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ebert et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § DDR- AND APOPTOSIS-TARGETING AGENTS · p. 12

    Many human neoplasms arise in the context of genetic defects that impair DNA damage repair in premalignant or malignant cells or prevent apoptosis of cells with DNA damage.

    “Multiple human neoplasms emerge in the context of (epi)genetic defects that limit the ability of (pre)malignant cells to repair DNA damage, such as loss-of-function mutations in BRCA1 DNA repair associated ( BRCA1 ), or prevent the apoptotic demise of cells accumulating DNA damage, such as alterations in the tumor protein p53 (TP53, best known as p53) system (Pilie ´ et al., 2019) or upregulation”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Pilie ´ et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Singh et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § ll · p. 12

    In some settings, PARP inhibitor-induced type I IFN is accompanied by release of T-cell chemoattractants including CXCL10 and by paracrine STING activation in DCs, leading to upregulation of MHC class II molecules and co-stimulatory ligands that support T-cell priming.

    “In some settings, this was accompanied by the release of T-cell chemoattractants, including CXCL10, as well as by paracrine STING activation in DCs, ultimately leading to upregulation of MHC class II molecules and co-stimulatory ligands in support of T-cell priming (Ding et al., 2018; Pantelidou et al., 2019)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ding et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Pantelidou et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § DDR- AND APOPTOSIS-TARGETING AGENTS · p. 12

    The BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax is approved by regulatory agencies for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma.

    “the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax has been approved by regulatory agencies for use in patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) (Ashkenazi et al., 2017)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ashkenazi et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Review Cell · p. 12

    Deregulated KRAS and PI3K signaling has strong oncogenic effects while also favoring immune evasion.

    “deregulated KRAS and PI3K signaling mediates robust oncogenic effects while favoring immunoevasion”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 11

    Pharmacological or genetic inhibition of PI3Kα, PI3Kδ, or AKT boosts effector T cell survival and activation by promoting autocrine IL2 signaling or by reducing the intratumoral abundance or suppressive functions of TREG cells, MDSCs, and TAMs.

    “Pharmacological or genetic inhibition of PI3K a , PI3K d , or AKT has been proposed to boost TEFF cell survival and activation by promoting autocrine IL2 signaling (Aragoneses-Fenoll et al., 2018; Carnevalli et al., 2018), or by limiting the intratumoral abundance or suppressive functions of TREG cells (Abu-Eid et al., 2014; Ali et al., 2014; Chellappa et al., 2019; Lim et al., 2018), MDSCs (Davis”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Aragoneses-Fenoll et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Carnevalli et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Abu-Eid et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Review Cell · p. 12

    Autophagy activation by MTOR inhibitors produces immunomodulatory effects that are highly context-dependent, which complicates the development of pharmacological autophagy modulators for cancer therapy.

    “autophagy activation by MTOR inhibitors mediates immunomodulatory effects with an elevated degree of context dependency, complicating the development of pharmacological autophagy modulators for cancer therapy (Galluzzi et al., 2017a)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Galluzzi et al., 2017a

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 16

    The immunosuppressive effects of RT-induced G2/M blockage can be offset by p53 loss or CHEK1 inhibition, leading to micronuclei accumulation, stronger type I IFN signaling, and potent systemic anticancer immunity.

    “Interestingly, the immunosuppressive effects of RT-driven G2/ M cell cycle blockage can also be offset by genetic (loss of the mouse p53-coding gene) and pharmacological (CHEK1 inhibition) interference with the G1 checkpoint, ultimately resulting in accrued accumulation of micronuclei, superior type I IFN signaling, and initiation of potent anticancer immunity with systemic outreach (Chen et al.,”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chen et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 16

    ATM drives IL8 secretion by breast cancer cells independently of its DNA damage response role, promoting disease progression through autocrine or paracrine mechanisms.

    “similar lines, ATM reportedly drives IL8 secretion by breast cancer cells independently of its role in the DDR, ultimately favoring disease progression via autocrine or paracrine mechanisms (Chen et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chen et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 16

    Venetoclax eliminates HR+ breast cancer cells that become senescent after CDK4/CDK6 inhibition, increasing MHC class I and PD-L1 levels.

    “In line with such a ''senolytic'' activity, venetoclax effectively eliminates HR + breast cancer cells undergoing senescence in response to CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors, culminating in increased levels of both MHC class I molecules and PD-L1 (Whittle et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Whittle et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § ll · p. 16

    Nutlin 3a-induced p53 reactivation elicits ICD in B16 melanomas, correlating with DC activation, CD8+ CTL expansion, and MDSC depletion.

    “Accordingly, p53 reactivation by nutlin 3a, a pharmacological inhibitor of the p53-degrading enzyme MDM2 proto-oncogene (MDM2), elicits ICD in B16 melanomas, correlating with DC activation, expansion of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + CTLs, and depletion of immunosuppressive MDSCs (Guo et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Guo et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 16

    Venetoclax and navitoclax are especially toxic to senescent cells, which in some settings produce immunomodulatory cytokines such as IL6 and VEGFA.

    “Venetoclax and navitoclax (an experimental inhibitor of various BCL2 family members) are particularly toxic for senescent cells, which (at least in some settings) produce immunomodulatory cytokines, including IL6 and VEGFA (Gorgoulis et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gorgoulis et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § ll · p. 16

    ABT-737 increases MDSC sensitivity to FAS-driven apoptosis in vitro and suppresses MDSC accumulation in murine mammary carcinomas.

    “Moreover, ABT-737 increases the sensitivity of MDSCs to FAS-driven apoptosis in vitro and suppresses MDSC accumulation in murine mammary carcinomas (Hu et al., 2013), even though its administration has been related to depletion of TEFF cells and enrichment of TREG cells in tumorfree mice (Gabriel et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hu et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § ll · p. 16

    Increased infiltration by exhausted PD-1+ CD8+ CTLs is associated with relapse of MYCN-driven mammary carcinomas after withdrawal of BCL2/BCL-XL inhibitors, and this relapse can be treated with PD-1 blockers.

    “Interestingly, increased tumor infiltration by exhausted PD-1 + CD8 + CTLs has been associated with the relapse of MYCN-driven mammary carcinomas upon withdrawal of BCL2/BCL-XL inhibitors, which also appears to be therapeutically actionable with PD-1 blockers (Haikala et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Haikala et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § ll · p. 16

    Venetoclax does not impair TEFF responsiveness to antigenic stimuli in vitro; it upregulates BCL-XL and supports T-cell survival, synergizing with ICIs in immunocompetent mouse colorectal carcinoma models.

    “Along similar lines, BCL2 inhibition by venetoclax does not impair TEFF cell responsiveness to antigenic stimuli in vitro , but rather promotes the compensatory upregulation of BCL2-like 1 (BCL2L1, best known as BCL-XL) and hence supports T-cell survival, de facto synergizing with ICIs in immunocompetent mouse models of colorectal carcinoma (Kohlhapp et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kohlhapp et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § ll · p. 16

    p53 is genetically or functionally lost in many malignancies, and this loss correlates with signs of local immunosuppression.

    “One of the main actors in DDR-driven BCL2-inhibitable apoptosis, p53, is genetically or functionally lost in a variety of malignancies (Pilie ´ et al., 2019), correlating with signs of local immunosuppression (Cui and Guo, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Pilie ´ et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Cui and Guo, 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 16

    Co-inhibition of ATM and WEE1 in human KRAS G12C-driven PDAC cells lowers secretion of IL8 and other invasion-supporting factors and reduces PD-L1 expression.

    “Accordingly, co-inhibition of ATM and WEE1 G2 checkpoint kinase (WEE1, another component of the DDR machinery) in human KRAS G12C -driven pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cancer (PDAC) cells results in decreased secretion of IL8 and other factors supporting local invasion, as well as in reduced PD-L1 expression (Jin et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jin et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § ll · p. 16

    Pharmacological p53 reactivation establishes cellular senescence linked to an immunostimulatory SASP that recruits and activates NK cells, TEFF cells, and tumoricidal macrophages.

    “Additional immunostimulatory effects linked to pharmacological p53 reactivation in cancer cells include (but are not limited to) (1) downregulation of immunomodulatory cytokines linked to tumor progression, such as IL6 (Sahin et al., 2020); (2) upregulation of NKALs (Textor et al., 2011); and (3) establishment of cellular senescence linked to an immunostimulatory SASP that favors the recruitment”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Iannello et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lujambio et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Xue et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § HER2, EGFR, VEGFA, AND TGFb INHIBITORS · p. 17

    The therapeutic activity of HER2-targeting mAbs correlates with NK cell abundance, is influenced by FcγR polymorphisms, and can be boosted preclinically by preventing NK dysfunction.

    “Accordingly, the therapeutic activity of these mAbs correlates with the abundance of NK cells, is influenced by genetic polymorphisms affecting Fc g R functions, and can be boosted (at least preclinically) by immunotherapeutic interventions preventing NK dysfunction (e.g., IL2 or IL12 administration) (Gennari et al., 2004; Jaime-Ramirez et al., 2011; Klein et al., 2017; Kono et al., 2002; Musolino”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gennari et al., 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Jaime-Ramirez et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Klein et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § ll · p. 16

    Alisertib depletes MDSCs in mouse mammary tumors and mediates an immunotherapeutic effect that ICIs can enhance.

    “Consistent with this notion, the AURKA inhibitor alisertib appears to promote tumor infiltration of CD8 + T cells via a non-canonical pathway involving IL10 secretion (Han et al., 2020b) and to directly deplete the MDSC compartment of mouse mammary tumors, ultimately mediating an immunotherapeutic effect that can be enhanced by ICIs (Yin et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yin et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 17

    EGFR-specific mAbs and EGFR-targeting TKIs such as erlotinib, when given with a tumor-targeting mAb, promote NK-cell ADCC; for TKIs this arises from upregulation of the mAb target on malignant cells.

    “Not only EGFR-specific mAbs (Roberti et al., 2011) but also EGFR-targeting TKIs such as erlotinib (in the presence of a tumor-targeting mAb) (Cavazzoni et al., 2012; Mallmann-Gottschalk et al., 2019) promote ADCC by NK cells, which, in the case of TKIs, originates from the upregulation of the mAb target (e.g., EGFR, HER2) by malignant cells (Cavazzoni et al., 2012; Mallmann-Gottschalk et al., 2019”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Roberti et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Cavazzoni et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Mallmann-Gottschalk et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 17

    EGFR-targeted agents induce ICD and consequent calreticulin exposure coupled with CD47 downregulation on malignant cells.

    “At least in part, this reflects the ability of EGFR-targeted agents to induce ICD (Garrido et al., 2011; Pozzi et al., 2016) (Box 1) and the consequent exposure of the ''eat-me'' signal calreticulin (CALR) coupled to the downregulation of the ''don't eat me'' signal CD47 on the surface of malignant cells (Nigro et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Garrido et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Pozzi et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Nigro et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 17

    Combining HER2-specific mAbs with pan-PI3K inhibitors or EGFR-specific mAbs produces therapeutic benefit linked to immune activation in preclinical tumor models.

    “A similar therapeutic benefit linked to signs of immune activation has also been documented (in preclinical tumor models) upon combining HER2specific mAbs with other targeted anticancer agents that mediate immunomodulatory properties, including pan-PI3K inhibitors (Choi et al., 2018) and EGFR-specific mAbs (Roda et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Choi et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Roda et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § HER2, EGFR, VEGFA, AND TGFb INHIBITORS · p. 17

    ERBB2 amplification and gain-of-function EGFR mutations support proliferation of various cancer cell types.

    “Indeed, while ERBB2 gene amplifications and gain-of-function EGFR mutations support the proliferation of various cancer cell types (Oh and Bang, 2020; Pao and Chmielecki, 2010), VEGFA is critical for tumor-driven neoangiogenesis (Apte et al., 2019) and TGFb promotes the establishment of a fibrotic microenvironment that is poorly permissive to access by therapeutics (Derynck et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Oh and Bang, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Pao and Chmielecki, 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 17

    This T-cell response reflects improved antigen presentation on MHC class I and II molecules and MYD88-dependent immunostimulation, increasing antigen processing and presentation by DCs.

    “tation on MHC class I and II molecules (Kono et al., 2004; Triulzi et al., 2018), as well as MYD88 innate immune signal transduction adaptor (MYD88)-dependent immunostimulation (Stagg et al., 2011), culminating in increased antigen processing and presentation by DCs (Gall et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kono et al., 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Triulzi et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Stagg et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 17

    Various EGFR-targeting agents improve MHC class I antigen presentation by cancer cells and favor tumor material uptake by DCs, T-cell priming, and NK-cell activation without additional immunostimulatory signals.

    “In addition, various EGFRtargeting agents improve MHC class I antigen presentation by cancer cells (Lizotte et al., 2018; Pollack et al., 2011) and favor the uptake of tumor material by DCs (Banerjee et al., 2008; Nigro et al., 2019) as well as their ability to prime T cells and promote NK-cell activation in the absence of additional immunostimulatory signals (Banerjee et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lizotte et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Pollack et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Banerjee et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 17

    ADCP-associated M2 polarization relies on AIM2 sensing of DNA from phagocytosed tumor cells, causing CGAS cleavage and inflammasome-dependent PD-L1 and IDO1 upregulation.

    “This process appears to rely on the sensing of DNA from phagocytosed tumor cells by absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2), resulting in CGAS cleavage coupled to PD-L1 and IDO1 upregulation via an inflammasome-dependent mechanism (Su et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Su et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 17

    Multiple immunotherapeutic agents, including DC vaccines, TLR2 agonists, IL21, and PD-L1 blockers, can magnify the efficacy of HER2-targeting mAbs and elicit robust anticancer immunity.

    “In line with this notion, the progressive loss of HER2-targeting CD4 + TH1 cells reportedly facilitates HER2-driven mammary carcinogenesis (Datta et al., 2015a), and multiple immunotherapeutic agents, including DC-based vaccines (Datta et al., 2015b; Linch et al., 2016), TLR2 agonists (Lu et al., 2011), recombinant IL21 (Roda et al., 2006), and PD-L1 blockers (Mittal et al., 2019), can be”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Datta et al., 2015b

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Linch et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lu et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 18

    Gefitinib upregulates NKALs in NSCLC cells, linked to enhanced NK-mediated ADCC.

    “NKAL upregulation by NSCLC cells, linked to enhanced NK-mediated ADCC”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites He et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kim et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 19

    EGFR-targeting agents such as gefitinib and osimertinib cause temporary accumulation of DCs and CD8+ TEFF cells with TREG and M2 TAM depletion in NSCLC, followed by MDSC-driven immunosuppression.

    “temporary DC and CD8 + T EFF accumulation coupled to T REG cell and M2TAMdepletion, rapidly followed by MDSC-driven immunosuppression in vivo”
    • Also stated in: § Review Cell · p. 19 · hedged
      “the TME of NSCLC exposed to EGFR-targeting agents exhibits increased abundance of DCs and CD8 + TEFF cells exhibiting limited signs of exhaustion coupled to the depletion of TREG cells and M2 TAMs, although such an effect appeared to be temporary and rapidly followed by MDSC-driven immunosuppression”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jia et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 18

    Gefitinib downregulates PD-L1 in NSCLC cells bearing EGFR mutations in vitro and in vivo, relieving immunosuppression.

    “PD-L1 downregulation in NSCLC cells bearing EGFR mutations in vitro and in vivo”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lin et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Zhang et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 19

    Anti-TGFb1,2 IgG2a upregulates MHC class I in squamous cell carcinoma cells, improving antigen presentation.

    “MHCclass I upregulation by squamous cell carcinoma cells”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tauriello et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 18

    Afatinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib upregulate MHC class I and II in ovarian carcinoma cells, improving antigen presentation by cancer cells.

    “MHC class I and II upregulation by ovarian carcinoma cells”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lizotte et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 18

    7A7 mAb induces ICD in lung cancer cells, with DAMP emission linked to DC maturation in vitro.

    “DAMPemission by lung cancer cells, linked to DC maturation in vitro”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Garrido et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 18

    Cetuximab activates DCs by enhancing uptake of tumor material and cross-presentation, followed by T-cell priming and NK-cell activation.

    “enhanced uptake of tumor material and cross-presentation by DCs, followed by priming of T cells and activation of NK cells”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Banerjee et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lee et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 19

    Trastuzumab and pertuzumab activate NK cells and induce NK-cell-mediated ADCC of HER2-expressing cancer cells.

    “induction of NK-cell-mediated ADCC of HER2-expressing cancer cells”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Misumi et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 19

    Trastuzumab upregulates MHC class I and II in HER2-overexpressing cancer cells and HER2+ breast cancer biopsies, improving antigen presentation.

    “MHC class I and II upregulation in different HER2-overexpressing cancer cells and HER2 + BC biopsies”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kono et al., 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Triulzi et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 18

    Cetuximab activates NK cells and induces NK-cell-mediated ADCC of cancer cells with mutated KRAS.

    “induction of NK-cell-mediated ADCC of cancer cells with mutated KRAS”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Roberti et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 18

    Cetuximab induces ICD in rectal carcinoma cells, with DAMP emission enhanced by chemotherapy and linked to phagocytosis of tumor cells by DCs.

    “DAMP emission by rectal carcinoma cells, enhanced by chemotherapy and linked to phagocytosis of tumor cells by DCs”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pozzi et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 18

    Erlotinib activates NK cells and induces NK-cell-mediated ADCC of ovarian cancer and NSCLC cells.

    “induction of NK-cell-mediated ADCC of ovarian cancer and NSCLC cells”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cavazzoni et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Mallmann-Gottschalk et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 19

    Trastuzumab activates macrophages and induces ADCP of HER2-expressing cancer cells.

    “induction of ADCP of HER2-expressing cancer cells”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shi et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 18

    Cetuximab polarizes M2-like TAMs that express high PD-L1 and secrete IL10 and VEGFA, as seen upon ADCP in vitro.

    “PD-L1 upregulation in macrophages upon ADCP in vitro”
    • Also stated in: § Review Cell · p. 19 · hedged
      “coupled to the accumulation of immunosuppressive M2-like TAMs expressing high PD-L1 levels and secreting IL10 and VEGFA”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pander et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 19

    Apatinib and sunitinib downregulate PD-L1 in osteosarcoma cells upon STAT3 inactivation, relieving immunosuppression.

    “PD-L1 downregulation in osteosarcoma cells upon inactivation of STAT3”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Duan et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Zheng et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 18

    IgA2 EGFR antibody activates macrophages and induces ADCP of epidermal carcinoma cells in vivo.

    “induction of ADCP of epidermal carcinoma cells in vivo”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Boross et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 18

    PD168393 upregulates MHC class I in primary and malignant human keratinocytes.

    “MHC class I upregulation in primary and malignant human keratinocytes”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pollack et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 19

    Trastuzumab activates DCs by enhancing uptake and cross-presentation of HER2, followed by T-cell priming.

    “enhanced uptake and cross-presentation of HER2 by DCs followed by T-cell priming”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gall et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 18

    Cetuximab upregulates MHC class I in primary and malignant human keratinocytes, improving antigen presentation by cancer cells.

    “MHC class I upregulation in primary and malignant human keratinocytes”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pollack et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 19

    Trastuzumab polarizes M2-like TAMs, which upregulate PD-L1 and IDO1 upon ADCP, linked to improved sensitivity to ICIs in mouse HER2+ breast cancer models.

    “PD-L1 and IDO1 upregulation by TAMs upon ADCP, linked to improved sensitivity to ICIs in mouse models of HER2 + BC”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Su et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 18

    Gefitinib downregulates NKALs in NSCLC cells, linked to reduced NK-mediated ADCC.

    “NKAL downregulation in NSCLC cells, linked to reduced NK-mediated ADCC”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Okita et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 18

    Erlotinib upregulates MHC class II in DCs and macrophages, improving antigen presentation by immune cells.

    “MHC class II upregulation by DCs and macrophages”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Venugopalan et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 19

    Galunisertib upregulates MHC class I in hepatic tumor organoids, linked to boosted TEFF responses and improved sensitivity to ICIs in vivo.

    “MHC class I upregulation by hepatic tumor organoid, linked to boosted T EFF cell responses and improved sensitivity to ICIs in vivo”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dodagatta-Marri et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 19

    A2V promotes vascular remodeling and TEFF cell extravasation via adhesion molecules and pro-inflammatory cytokines by ECs in mammary tumors.

    “T EFF cell extravasation upon expression of adhesion molecules and pro-inflammatory cytokines by ECs in mammary tumors”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schmittnaegel et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 19

    Bevacizumab downregulates PD-L1 in biopsies from glioblastoma patients, relieving immunosuppression.

    “PD-L1 downregulation in biopsies from patients with glioblastoma”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tamura et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 19

    A2V upregulates PD-L1 in cancer and ECs of mammary tumors, linked to improved sensitivity to ICIs in vivo.

    “PD-L1 upregulation in cancer and ECs of mammary tumors, linked to improved sensitivity to ICIs in vivo”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schmittnaegel et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 20

    VEGFR2 inhibition with apatinib reverses immunosuppression and sensitizes VEGFA-overexpressing mammary and colorectal mouse tumors to PD-1 blockade.

    “kinase insert domain receptor (KDR, best known as VEGFR2) inhibition with apatinib reverses immunosuppression and sensitizes VEGFA-overexpressing mammary and colorectal mouse tumors to immunotherapy with PD-1 blockers”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al., 2020c

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 20

    Similar immunomodulatory findings have been documented in blood or tumor samples from renal cell carcinoma patients receiving sunitinib and NSCLC or mammary carcinoma patients receiving bevacizumab.

    “Similar findings have been documented in blood or tumor samples from patients with renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Finke et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites de Goeje et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites von der Lippe Gythfeldt et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § Review Cell · p. 19

    The discrepancy in gefitinib effects on NKALs may reflect a cell-type-dependent mechanism linked to EGFR mutational status and/or drug concentration.

    “potentially reflecting a cell-type-dependent mechanism linked to EGFR mutational status and/or the concentration of the drug employed in this context”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Okita et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Review Cell · p. 21

    Clinical responses in that study were limited, most likely due to PD-1-dependent functional defects of the T-cell compartment at baseline.

    “clinical responses in this study were limited, most likely as a consequence of PD-1-dependent functional defects of the T-cell compartment at baseline”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Formenti et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 21

    Pharmacological inhibition of TGFb or its receptors resolves immunological exclusion and improves antigen presentation by malignant cells, leading to potent anticancer immune responses with ICIs toward disease eradication and protective immunological memory in mouse models of melanoma, colorectal, breast, and squamous cell carcinoma.

    “pharmacological inhibition of TGFb or its receptors resolves immunological exclusion and improves antigen presentation by malignant cells, culminating in potent anticancer immune responses that can be actioned with ICIs toward disease eradication and establishment of protective immunological memory, at least in mouse models of melanoma”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ravi et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tauriello et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Dodagatta-Marri et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 21

    TGFb favors expansion of TREG cells and MDSCs, culminating in local and systemic immunosuppression.

    “favor the expansion of TREG cells and MDSCs, culminating in local and systemic immunosuppression”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Batlle and Massague, 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § OTHERS · p. 21

    Imatinib demonstrates immunostimulatory effects linked to NK-cell activation and TREG cell depletion.

    “Imatinib was arguably the first targeted anticancer agent to demonstrate immunostimulatory effects that are directly linked to NK-cell activation”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Borg et al., 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Menard et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tanaka et al., 2020 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 22

    In preclinical non-small cell lung cancer models, crizotinib treatment is linked to higher T-cell exhaustion markers and increased PD-L1 on cancer cells.

    “The multi-TKI crizotinib has also been associated with increased markers of T-cell exhaustion and PD-L1 upregulation on malignant cells in preclinical NSCLC models”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Liu et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Review Cell · p. 21

    Combinatorial regimens involving ICIs and other immunomodulatory drugs offer added therapeutic possibilities.

    “with emphasis on the added therapeutic possibilities offered by combinatorial regimens involving ICIs and other immunomodulatory drugs”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 22

    Imatinib treatment is associated with PD-1 upregulation in T cells from GIST patients and PD-L1 downregulation on mouse GIST cells, correlating with added therapeutic effect of PD-1 blockade with imatinib in a preclinical GIST model.

    “imatinib treatment has been associated with PD-1 upregulation in T cells from patients with GIST (but with PD-L1 downregulation on mouse GIST cells), correlating with an added therapeutic effect for PD-1 blockage in the context of imatinib administration in a preclinical GIST model”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Seifert et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § OTHERS · p. 21

    Imatinib clinical activity in GIST is linked to IFNG production by patient NK cells and NK-cell-activating receptor expression pattern.

    “the clinical activity of imatinib in individuals with GIST is linked to IFNG production by the patient's NK cells”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Menard et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Delahaye et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rusakiewicz et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 22

    EZH2 inhibition reprograms TREG cells and creates a tumor microenvironment that permits anticancer immunity.

    “TREG reprogramming coupled to the establishment of a TME permissive for anticancer immunity”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Sun et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wang et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Zingg et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § OTHERS · p. 21

    CML patients achieving deep molecular responses on imatinib or other TKIs exhibit restored NK-cell activity, PD-1 downregulation on T cells, and contraction of the MDSC compartment.

    “patients with CML achieving deep molecular responses upon treatment with imatinib or other TKIs”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hughes et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § OTHERS · p. 21

    Imatinib and nilotinib enable M2-like TAMs to repolarize toward an M1-like phenotype and activate NK cells in response to TLR stimulation.

    “both imatinib and nilotinib enable M2like TAMs to repolarize toward an M1-like phenotype and activate NK cells in response to TLR stimulation”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bellora et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Zhang et al., 2018b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § OTHERS · p. 21

    CLL patients treated with ibrutinib show reversal of T-cell exhaustion and diversification of the circulating TCR repertoire.

    “A similar reversal of T-cell exhaustion coupled to a diversification of the circulating TCR repertoire has been observed in patients with CLL treated with the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kondo et al., 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Yin et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 25

    TREG cells express CDK4/CDK6 and VEGF receptors, making them especially sensitive to CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors and bevacizumab.

    “TREG cells express CDK4/CDK6 as well as VEGF receptors (Goel et al., 2017; Terme et al., 2013) and hence are particularly sensitive to CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors and bevacizumab”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Goel et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Terme et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § ll · p. 22

    Most, if not all, targeted anticancer agents exert immunomodulatory effects that matter for therapeutic efficacy and for designing better combinatorial regimens.

    “Taken together, these observations lend additional support to the notion that most, if not all, targeted anticancer agents mediate immunomodulatory effects that are highly relevant not only for therapeutic efficacy but also for the design of novel combinatorial regimens with superior clinical impact.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Box 2. ICIs for cancer therapy · p. 26

    Several immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting other co-inhibitory receptors are being extensively tested in clinical trials.

    “various ICIs targeting other co-inhibitory receptors are being extensively tested for efficacy in clinical trials”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Tang et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Vanpouille-Box et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § CONCLUDING REMARKS · p. 22

    Targeted anticancer agents produce strong immunomodulatory effects that can influence their clinical activity.

    “Targeted anticancer agents mediate robust immunomodulatory effects that may influence their clinical activity”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Box 2. ICIs for cancer therapy · p. 26

    Approved immune checkpoint inhibitors include CTLA4 blockers such as ipilimumab, PD-1 inhibitors such as pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and cemiplimab, and PD-L1 inhibitors such as avelumab, atezolizumab, and durvalumab.

    “These agents include blockers of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4), such as ipilimumab, as well as inhibitors of programmed cell death 1 (PDCD1, best known as PD-1), such as pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and cemiplimab, or its main ligand CD274 (best known as PD-L1), such as avelumab, atezolizumab, and durvalumab”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ribas and Wolchok, 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Box 2. ICIs for cancer therapy · p. 26

    Experimental immune checkpoint inhibitors include agents against LAG3, VISTA, TIM-3, and NKG2A.

    “inhibitors of lymphocyte activating 3 (LAG3), V-set immunoregulatory receptor (VSIR, best known as VISTA), and hepatitis A virus cellular receptor 2 (HAVCR2, best known as TIM-3), as well as drugs that block the NK-cell co-inhibitory receptor killer cell lectin-like receptor C1 (KLRC1, best known as NKG2A)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Tang et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Vanpouille-Box et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Review Cell · p. 25

    Abemaciclib, although designed to inhibit CDK4/CDK6, also targets other CDKs and CDK-unrelated kinases.

    “abemaciclib was conceived to inhibit CDK4/CDK6 but has been shown to target other CDKs as well as CDK-unrelated kinases”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chen et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Box 2. ICIs for cancer therapy · p. 26

    Monoclonal antibodies that block co-inhibitory receptors on immune effector cells or their ligands on neoplastic and myeloid cells produce strong immunostimulation that can reactivate anticancer immune responses and yield clinical benefit in many malignancies.

    “monoclonal antibodies that block co-inhibitory receptors (on immune effector cells) or their ligands (on neoplastic and myeloid cells) mediate immunostimulatory effects so robust as to translate in the (re)activation of anticancer immuneresponses associated with clinical benefits in patients affected by an ever-growing number of malignancies”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ribas and Wolchok, 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Review Cell · p. 25

    No targeted anticancer agent was designed specifically to produce immunomodulatory effects.

    “No targeted anticancer agent was purposely designed to mediate immunomodulatory effects”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Review Cell · p. 25

    Immunomodulation by targeted anticancer therapy sometimes clearly comes from on-target effects, but often comes from alternative, frequently uncharacterized, molecular players.

    “although in some cases immunomodulation by targeted anticancer therapy clearly originates from on-target effects, in many others it stems from alternative (often uncharacterized) molecular players”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Box 2. ICIs for cancer therapy · p. 26

    At least seven immune checkpoint inhibitors are approved by the FDA or equivalent agencies worldwide for cancer patients, covering a large range of oncological indications.

    “no less than seven different immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are currently approved by the FDA or equivalent agencies worldwide for use in cancer patients, cumulatively encompassing a large panel of oncological indications”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ribas and Wolchok, 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Cell · p. 27

    Pharmacological inhibition of EZH2 has therapeutic activity tied to robust immunostimulation but appears linked to expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells.

    “Pharmacological inhibition of enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit (EZH2) exerts therapeutic activity linked to robust immunostimulation, but appears to be associated with myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) expansion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Cell · p. 27

    5-fluorouracil- or gemcitabine-based chemotherapy depletes myeloid-derived suppressor cells and/or limits their immunosuppressive functions.

    “chemotherapeutic regimens that deplete MDSCs and/or limit their immunosuppressive functions, such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)- or gemcitabine-based chemotherapy”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Cell · p. 27

    CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors cause robust cytostatic activity along with multipronged immunostimulatory effects and upregulation of PD-L1.

    “Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4)/CDK6 inhibitors mediate robust cytostatic activity that is accompanied by multipronged immunostimulatory effects but also PD-L1 upregulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Box 2. ICIs for cancer therapy · p. 26

    These findings confirm that immune effectors play a key role in the therapeutic efficacy of radiotherapy and TGFb blockers.

    “Besides confirming the key role of immune effector in the therapeutic efficacy of RT and TGFb blockers”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Review Cell · p. 25

    Experimental variables such as drug concentration, medium composition, and timing may have unexpected effects on biological outcomes.

    “experimental variables such as drug concentration, precise medium composition, and time may have unsuspected effects on biological outcomes”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
106 of 106

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stable or transient inhibition of autophagy can limit antitumor immune responses mediated by chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and/or targeted therapy.

    “as stable or transient inhibition of autophagy not only can limit antitumor immune responses mediated by chemotherapy, radiation therapy (Galluzzi et al, 2017b; Galluzzi et al, 2020a), and/or targeted therapy (Petroni et al, 2021)”

    From Autophagy in major human diseases (2021) · cites this paper as Petroni et al, 2021

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 306 · Cited by 212

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Derynck, 2020, TGFbeta biology in cancer progression and immunotherapy, Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol.

Authors
Petroni, G., Buqué, A., Zitvogel, L., Kroemer, G., & Galluzzi, L.
Affiliations
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Université Paris Cité (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Kroemer, Guido
  • Galluzzi, Lorenzo
Venue
Cancer Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
310-345
ISSN
1535-6108 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3111468108
Cited by
212
References
306
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 36
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Seerave Foundation
  • High-end Foreign Experts Recruitment Plan of China (GDW20171100085, GDW20181100051)
  • U.S. Department of Defense (BC180476P1, ZP-6177)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine
  • Labex Immuno-Oncology
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Bayer HealthCare
  • AstraZeneca
  • Institut National Du Cancer
  • Boehringer Ingelheim
  • Cancéropôle Ile de France
  • Stand Up To Cancer
  • Chancellerie des Universités de Paris
  • Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
  • Ligue Contre le Cancer
  • Weill Cornell Medical College
  • Institut Universitaire de France
  • Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  • Institut Mérieux
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  • Genentech
  • Fondation Leducq
  • Roche
  • Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune cells in cancer
Keywords
targeted anticancer agents, immunomodulation, immunostimulatory effects, immunosuppressive activity, tumor immunology, targeted therapy, cancer immunotherapy, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Humans, Neoplasms, Disease Progression, Immunomodulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review