Cited by 30Prostate Cancer Treatment and ResearchProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Development and Validation of a Prostate Cancer Genomic Signature that Predicts Early ADT Treatment Response Following Radical Prostatectomy

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: Currently, no genomic signature exists to distinguish men most likely to progress on adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer. Here we develop and validate a gene expression signature to predict response to postoperative ADT. Experimental Design: A training set consisting of 284 radical prostatectomy patients was established after 1:1 propensity score matching metastasis between adjuvant-ADT (a-ADT)-treated and no ADT–treated groups. An ADT Response Signature (ADT-RS) was identified from neuroendocrine and AR signaling–related genes. Two independent cohorts were used to form three separate data sets for validation (set I, n = 232; set II, n = 435; set III, n = 612). The primary endpoint of the analysis was postoperative metastasis. Results: Increases in ADT-RS score were associated with a reduction in risk of metastasis only in a-ADT patients. On multivariable analysis, ADT-RS by ADT treatment interaction term remained associated with metastasis in both validation sets (set I: HR = 0.18, Pinteraction = 0.009; set II: HR = 0.25, Pinteraction = 0.019). In a matched validation set III, patients with Low ADT-RS scores had similar 10-year metastasis rates in the a-ADT and no-ADT groups (30.1% vs. 31.0%, P = 0.989). Among High ADT-RS patients, 10-year metastasis rates were significantly lower for a-ADT versus no-ADT patients (9.4% vs. 29.2%, P = 0.021). The marginal ADT-RS by ADT interaction remained significant in the matched dataset (Pinteraction = 0.035). Conclusions: Patients with High ADT-RS benefited from a-ADT. In combination with prognostic risk factors, use of ADT-RS may thus allow for identification of ADT-responsive tumors that may benefit most from early androgen blockade after radical prostatectomy. We discovered a gene signature that when present in primary prostate tumors may be useful to predict patients who may respond to early ADT after surgery. Clin Cancer Res; 24(16); 3908–16. ©2018 AACR.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-2745

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Publicly available gene expression data from a matched cohort of mCRPC was downloaded from cBioportal.

    “Publicly available gene expression data from a matched cohort established previously59 or mCRPC was downloaded from cBioportal (20 May 2021)94–96.”

    From Genome-scale CRISPR screens identify PTGES3 as a direct modulator of androgen receptor function in advanced prostate cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [59]

    The Study design section (page unavailable) describes a previously established, propensity-score-matched cohort and gene-expression profiles from men following radical prostatectomy. It does not identify that cohort as mCRPC; the profiles were retrieved from the Decipher GRID database, not cBioPortal. In the citing sentence, separate references appear to support the cBioPortal download. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 30

Metadata

Authors
Karnes, R. J., Sharma, V., Choeurng, V., Ashab, H. A.-D., Erho, N., Alshalalfa, M., Trock, B., Ross, A., Yousefi, K., Tsai, H., Zhao, S. G., Tosoian, J. J., Haddad, Z., Takhar, M., Chang, S. L., Spratt, D. E., Abdollah, F., Jenkins, R. B., Klein, E. A., Nguyen, P. L., Dicker, A. P., Den, R. B., Davicioni, E., Feng, F. Y., Lotan, T. L., & Schaeffer, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • City of Vancouver (CA)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • 6Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Henry Ford Hospital (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Karnes, R. Jeffrey
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2018-08-14
Volume
24
Issue
16
Pages
3908-3916
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2804058066
Cited by
30
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • The Medicine Forum (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (U01CA196390, P50CA180995)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
prostate cancer, adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy, radical prostatectomy, gene expression signatures, metastasis risk, neuroendocrine prostate cancer, androgen receptor signaling, treatment response biomarkers, high-risk prostate cancer, propensity score matching, prognostic biomarker validation, metastasis-free survival, biochemical recurrence, prostate-specific antigen
MeSH terms
Aged, Androgen Antagonists, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Proteins, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Prognosis, Prostate, Prostatectomy, Prostatic Neoplasms, Seminal Vesicles, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Genomics, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review