Cited by 99HER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchGastric Cancer Management and OutcomesBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approval: Neratinib for the Extended Adjuvant Treatment of Early-Stage HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Open access
Singh, Harpreet, Walker, Amanda J., Amiri-Kordestani, Laleh, Cheng, Joyce, Tang, Shenghui, Balcazar, Pamela, Barnett-Ringgold, Kimberly, Palmby, Todd R. +12 more·2018·Clinical Cancer Research

Abstract

On July 17, 2017, the FDA approved neratinib (NERLYNX; Puma Biotechnology, Inc.) for the extended adjuvant treatment of adult patients with early-stage HER2-overexpressed/amplified breast cancer, to follow adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy. Approval was based on data from ExteNET, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Women with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer and within 2 years of completing adjuvant trastuzumab were randomized to neratinib (n = 1,420) or placebo (n = 1,420) for 1 year. The primary endpoint was invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), defined as the time between randomization date to first occurrence of invasive recurrence (local/regional, ipsilateral, or contralateral breast cancer), distant recurrence, or death from any cause, with 2 years and 28 days of follow-up. The trial showed a statistically significant treatment effect favoring neratinib with a stratified HR of 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.49–0.90, P = 0.008]. The estimated iDFS rate at 2 years was 94.2% (95% CI, 92.6%–95.4%) in patients treated with neratinib versus 91.9% (95% CI, 90.2%–93.2%) in those receiving placebo. Diarrhea was the most common adverse event (AE), with a 40% incidence of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea, and represents the most common AE leading to treatment discontinuation. Other frequent AEs (>10% incidence) were nausea, abdominal pain, fatigue, vomiting, rash, stomatitis, decreased appetite, and muscle spasms. Other than diarrhea, neratinib is associated with a low incidence of severe AEs; toxicities are generally reversible and manageable with dose interruptions, dose reductions, and/or standard medical care. This article summarizes FDA decision-making and data supporting the neratinib approval. Clin Cancer Res; 24(15); 3486–91. ©2018 AACR. See related commentary by Unni et al., p. 3483

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-3628

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neratinib competitively occupies the ATP-binding site on EGFR and binds to the unique amino acid residue Cys805 near the opening of the pocket-a homologous cysteine residue to EGFR Cys797-to undergo alkylation or covalent bonding, thus achieving irreversible inhibition of HER2.

    “Not only does it competitively occupy the ATP-binding site on EGFR, but it also binds to the unique amino acid residue Cys805 near the opening of the pocket-a homologous cysteine residue to EGFR Cys797-to undergo alkylation or covalent bonding, thus achieving irreversible inhibition of HER2.154,155”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, H., Walker, A. J., Amiri-Kordestani, L., Cheng, J., Tang, S., Balcazar, P., Barnett-Ringgold, K., Palmby, T. R., Cao, X., Zheng, N., Liu, Q., Yu, J., Pierce, W. F., Daniels, S. R., Sridhara, R., Ibrahim, A., Kluetz, P. G., Blumenthal, G. M., Beaver, J. A., & Pazdur, R.
Affiliations
  • United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, Maryland.
Corresponding author
Singh, Harpreet
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2018-07-31
Volume
24
Issue
15
Pages
3486-3491
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2789795986
Cited by
99
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
neratinib, HER2-positive breast cancer, early breast cancer, extended adjuvant therapy, trastuzumab, FDA drug approval, invasive disease-free survival, diarrhea, adverse events, tyrosine kinase inhibitors
MeSH terms
Trastuzumab, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Breast Neoplasms, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Neoplasm Staging, Quinolines, Disease-Free Survival, Receptor, ErbB-2, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review