Cited by 70Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsGenomics and Rare Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Path toward Precision Oncology: Review of Targeted Therapy Studies and Tools to Aid in Defining “Actionability” of a Molecular Lesion and Patient Management Support

Abstract

Precision medicine trials and targeted therapies have shifted to the forefront of oncology. Although targeted therapies have shown initial promise, implementation across the broad landscape of oncology has many challenges. These limitations include an incomplete understanding of the functional significance of variant alleles as well as the need for clinical research and practice models that are more patient-centered and account for the complexity of individual patient tumors. Furthermore, successful implementation of targeted therapies will also be predicated on efforts to standardize the framework for patient management support. Here, we review current implementations of targeted therapies in precision oncology and discuss how “actionability” is defined for molecular targets in cancer therapeutics. We also comment on the growing need for bioinformatics tools and data platforms to complement advances in precision oncology. Finally, we discuss current frameworks for integrating precision oncology into patient management and propose an integrated model that combines features of molecular tumor boards and decision support systems. Mol Cancer Ther; 16(12); 2645–55. ©2017 AACR. See related article by Pilié et al., p. 2641

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-17-0597

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 70

Metadata

Authors
Chae, Y. K., Pan, A. P., Davis, A. A., Patel, S. P., Carneiro, B. A., Kurzrock, R., & Giles, F. J.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Published
2017-12-01
Volume
16
Issue
12
Pages
2645-2655
ISSN
  • 1535-7163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-8514
OpenAlex
W2773480817
Cited by
70
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
precision oncology, targeted therapy, molecular tumor board, decision support system, variant alleles, bioinformatics software, clinical management, patient-centered care
MeSH terms
Psychosocial Support Systems, Humans, Medical Oncology, Precision Medicine, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review