Cited by 770

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

PANTHER version 10: expanded protein families and functions, and analysis tools

Mi, Huaiyu, Poudel, Sagar, Muruganujan, Anushya, Casagrande, John T., Thomas, Paul D.·2016·Nucleic Acids Research

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkv1194

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Identification of WASH-FAM21-CCC-retriever-SNX17 pathway provides a mechanism to account for several studies showing role for WASH complex in α5β1-integrin recycling even though sorting of this cargo is retromer-independent.

    “Importantly, the identification of the WASH-FAM21-CCC-retriever-SNX17 pathway provides a mechanism to account for several studies that have shown a role for the WASH complex in α5β1-integrin recycling even though the sorting of this cargo is known to be retromer-independent26, 56–58.”

    From Retriever is a multiprotein complex for retromer-independent endosomal cargo recycling (2017) · cites this paper as [56]

    Our copy discusses PANTHER protein families and analysis tools, including the Prowler interface (Website and Analysis Tool Improvements; page unavailable). Searches for the WASH–FAM21–CCC–retriever–SNX17 pathway and for integrin recycling found no passage addressing the proposed mechanism or retromer-independent sorting. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Endosomal association of FAM21 and WASH is mediated through both retromer-dependent and retromer-independent mechanisms in human cells.

    “This clearly establishes that in human cells the endosomal association of FAM21 and WASH is mediated through both retromer-dependent and retromer-independent mechanisms, a conclusion that is in agreement with work in Dictyostelium describing the retromer-independent recruitment of the WASH complex56.”

    From Retriever is a multiprotein complex for retromer-independent endosomal cargo recycling (2017) · cites this paper as [56]

    The cited paper’s Improved phylogenetic trees and Prowler in JavaScript sections (pages not provided) discuss PANTHER data and tools, not endosomal recruitment. Searches for FAM21, WASH, retromer-dependent mechanisms, and Dictyostelium recruitment found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. 10.1093/nar/gku989 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Koonin E.V. Galperin M.Y. Sequence - Evolution - Function: Computational Approaches in Comparative Genomics. Boston: Kluwer Academic; 2003. Evolutionary Concept in Genetics and Genomics. · DOI
  3. Thomas P.D. Encyclopedia of Genetics, Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics. Chichester: Wiley; 2006. PANTHER: Protein families and subfamilies modeled on the divergence of function. p. 1-5. · DOI
  4. 10.1093/bib/bbr042 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/nar/26.18.4291 · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.1088821 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/nar/gki418 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/nar/gkl229 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nprot.2013.092 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/nar/gks1118 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/nar/gkr944 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/nar/30.7.1575 · DOI
  13. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-312 · DOI
  14. 10.1186/1471-2148-3-2 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1101/gr.772403 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/978-1-60761-175-2_7 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/nar/gkt1146 · DOI
  18. Fang H. Oates ME. Pethica R.B. Greenwood J.M. Sardar A.J. Rackham O.J. Donoghue P.C. Stamatakis A. de Lima Morais D.A. Gough J. A daily-updated tree of (sequenced) life as a reference for genome research. Sci. Rep. 2013. doi:10.1038/srep02015. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mi, H., Poudel, S., Muruganujan, A., Casagrande, J. T., & Thomas, P. D.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2015-11-17
Volume
44
Issue
D1
Pages
D336-D342
ISSN
  • 0305-1048
  • 1362-4962
Cited by
770
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review