Abstract CT001: a personalized cancer vaccine, mRNA-4157, combined with pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab in patients with resected high-risk melanoma: efficacy and safety results from the randomized, open-label Phase 2 mRNA-4157-P201/Keynote-942 trial
Abstract
Abstract Background: Targeting of mutation-derived epitopes (neoantigens) by T cells has been demonstrated to drive anti-tumor immune responses. mRNA-4157 is a novel mRNA-based personalized cancer vaccine, which encodes up to 34 patient-specific tumor neoantigens. It was hypothesized mRNA-4157 could synergize with adjuvant pembrolizumab to improve recurrence free survival (RFS) in patients with resected stages IIIB/IIIC/IIID and IV melanoma. Methods: Eligible patients with completely resected, high-risk cutaneous melanoma were randomly assigned 2:1 (stratified by stage) to receive mRNA-4157 in combination with pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab alone. mRNA-4157 (1mg) was administered intramuscularly every 3 weeks for a total of 9 doses and pembrolizumab (200mg) intravenously was given every 3 weeks for up to 18 cycles. Safety was evaluated as a secondary endpoint. RFS in the overall intention-to-treat population was the primary end point. The study was designed with 80% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.5 with an overall 1-sided type I error of 0.1 when a total of 40 RFS events were observed. The primary analysis for RFS was specified to occur after all patients completed a minimum of 12 months on study and at least 40 RFS events were observed. Results: 107 patients received the combination of mRNA-4157 with pembrolizumab and 50 patients were treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy. Recurrence or death was reported in 24 of 107 patients (22.4%) in the combination arm and in 20 of 50 patients (40%) in the monotherapy arm, at a median follow-up of 101 and 105 weeks respectively. 18-month RFS rates (95% CI) were 78.6% (69.0%, 85.6%) vs 62.2% (46.9%, 74.3%) in the combination and monotherapy arm respectively. The combination showed protocol defined statistical significance and a clinically meaningful improvement in RFS compared to pembrolizumab, with a reduction in the risk of recurrence or death by 44% (HR = 0.561; 95% CI: (0.309, 1.017); stratified log-rank test 1-sided p-value of 0.0266. The majority of treatment related adverse events were Grade 1/2. The number of patients reporting treatment related Grade ≥ 3 adverse events was generally similar between the arms (25% vs 18%, respectively). The most common mRNA-4157 related Grade 3 event was fatigue. No Grade 4 or Grade 5 events related to mRNA-4157 were reported. No potentiation of immune-mediated adverse events were observed with the addition of mRNA-4157 to pembrolizumab. Conclusions: mRNA-4157 in combination with pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy for resected high-risk melanoma significantly prolonged RFS compared to pembrolizumab without an increase in clinically meaningful adverse events. These results are the first to demonstrate improvement of RFS over adjuvant standard of care PD-1 blockade in resected high-risk melanoma and provide the first randomized evidence that a personalized neoantigen approach is potentially beneficial for cancer patients. A phase 3 study will be initiated in patients with melanoma. Citation Format: Adnan Khattak, Matteo Carlino, Tarek Meniawy, George Ansstas, Theresa Medina, Matthew H. Taylor, Kevin B. Kim, Meredith McKean, Georgina V. Long, Ryan J. Sullivan, Mark Faries, Thuy Tran, Charles Cowey, Andrew Pecora, Jennifer Segar, Victoria Atkinson, Geoffrey T. Gibney, Jason Luke, Sajeve Thomas, Elizabeth Buchbinder, Peijie Hou, Lili Zhu, Tal Zaks, Michelle Brown, Praveen Aanur, Robert S. Meehan, Jeffrey S. Weber. A personalized cancer vaccine, mRNA-4157, combined with pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab in patients with resected high-risk melanoma: Efficacy and safety results from the randomized, open-label Phase 2 mRNA-4157-P201/Keynote-942 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT001.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Personalized cancer vaccines are being tested in a wide variety of clinical indications, and recent trial data indicate their potential role in combination with existing immune-checkpoint blockade.
“personalized cancer vaccines are being tested in a wide variety of clinical indications, and recent trial data indicate their potential role in combination with existing immune-checkpoint blockade (139).”
From Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions (2024) · cites this paper as [139]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 51
- Authors
- Khattak, A., Carlino, M., Meniawy, T., Ansstas, G., Medina, T., Taylor, M. H., Kim, K. B., McKean, M., Long, G. V., Sullivan, R. J., Faries, M., Tran, T., Cowey, C., Pecora, A., Segar, J., Atkinson, V., Gibney, G. T., Luke, J., Thomas, S., Buchbinder, E., Hou, P., Zhu, L., Zaks, T., Brown, M., Aanur, P., Meehan, R. S., & Weber, J. S.
- Affiliations
- Hollywood Private Hospital (AU)
- Westmead Hospital (AU)
- St John of God Subiaco Hospital (AU)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- 5University of Colorado, Aurora, CO;
- 6Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Portland, OR;
- California Pacific Medical Center (US)
- Sarah Cannon (US)
- Melanoma Institute Australia (AU)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Angeles Clinic and Research Institute (US)
- Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
- 13Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX;
- 14John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ;
- University of Arizona Cancer Center (US)
- Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU)
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center (US)
- Orlando Health (US)
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
- 21Moderna Inc., Cambridge, MA;
- 22OrbiMed, New York, NY;
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- ORCID
- Khattak, Adnan
- Carlino, Matteo
- Meniawy, Tarek
- Ansstas, George
- Medina, Theresa
- Taylor, Matthew H.
- Kim, Kevin B.
- McKean, Meredith
- Long, Georgina V.
- Sullivan, Ryan J.
- Faries, Mark
- Cowey, Charles
- Pecora, Andrew
- Segar, Jennifer
- Atkinson, Victoria
- Gibney, Geoffrey T.
- Luke, Jason
- Thomas, Sajeve
- Buchbinder, Elizabeth
- Hou, Peijie
- Brown, Michelle
- Aanur, Praveen
- Meehan, Robert S.
- Weber, Jeffrey S.
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2023-05-29
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 8_Supplement
- Pages
- CT001-CT001
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- OpenAlex
- W4381283833
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 11
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
- Keywords
- personalized cancer vaccines, mRNA vaccines, neoantigens, pembrolizumab, high-risk melanoma, recurrence-free survival, adjuvant immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, cutaneous melanoma, immune-related adverse events, immune-related pneumonitis, immune-related colitis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review