The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advanced Drug Delivery Systems of Curcumin for Cancer Chemoprevention
Open accessAbstract
Since ancient times, chemopreventive agents have been used to treat/prevent several diseases including cancer. They are found to elicit a spectrum of potent responses including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antiproliferative, anticarcinogenic, and antiangiogenic activity in various cell cultures and some animal studies. Research over the past 4 decades has shown that chemopreventives affect a number of proteins involved in various molecular pathways that regulate inflammatory and carcinogenic responses in a cell. Various enzymes, transcription factors, receptors, and adhesion proteins are also affected by chemopreventives. Although, these natural compounds have shown significant efficacy in cell culture studies, they elicited limited efficacy in various clinical studies. Their introduction into the clinical setting is hindered largely by their poor solubility, rapid metabolism, or a combination of both, ultimately resulting in poor bioavailability upon oral administration. Therefore, to circumvent these limitations and to ease their transition to clinics, alternate strategies should be explored. Drug delivery systems such as nanoparticles, liposomes, microemulsions, and polymeric implantable devices are emerging as one of the viable alternatives that have been shown to deliver therapeutic concentrations of various potent chemopreventives such as curcumin, ellagic acid, green tea polyphenols, and resveratrol into the systemic circulation. In this review article, we have attempted to provide a comprehensive outlook for these delivery approaches, using curcumin as a model agent, and discussed future strategies to enable the introduction of these highly potent chemopreventives into a physician's armamentarium. Cancer Prev Res; 4(8); 1158–71. ©2011 AACR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bioavailability of curcumin: Problems and promises
Anand, P., Kunnumakkara, A. B., Newman, R. A., & Aggarwal, B. B. (2007) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp700113r · Cited by 5,543
Aggarwal, B. B., & Sung, B. (2009) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2008.11.002 · Cited by 1,140
Therapeutic applications of implantable drug delivery systems
Dash, A., & Cudworth, G. (1998) · Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods · doi:10.1016/s1056-8719(98)00027-6 · Cited by 358
Italia, J. L., Bhatt, D. K., Bhardwaj, V., Tikoo, K., & Kumar, M. N. V. R. (2007) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.02.004 · Cited by 203
Cited by
Muhammadi, Shabina, Afzal, M., & Hameed, S. (2015) · Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews · doi:10.1080/17518253.2015.1109715 · Cited by 357
Shamseddin, A., Crauste, C., Durand, E., Villeneuve, P., Dubois, G., Durand, T., Vercauteren, J., & Veas, F. (2017) · European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/ejlt.201700171 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Bansal, S. S., Goel, M., Aqil, F., Vadhanam, M. V., & Gupta, R. C.
- Venue
- Cancer Prevention Research
- Published
- 2011-08-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1158-1171
- ISSN
- 1940-6207 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-6215
- OpenAlex
- W2148663802
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.