Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 464

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Response to Cabozantinib in Patients with RET Fusion-Positive Lung Adenocarcinomas

Open access
Drilon, Alexander, Wang, Lu, Hasanovic, Adnan, Suehara, Yoshiyuki, Lipson, Doron, Stephens, Phil, Ross, Jeffrey, Miller, Vincent, Ginsberg, Michelle, Zakowski, Maureen F., Kris, Mark G., Ladanyi, Marc, Rizvi, Naiyer·2013·Cancer Discovery

Abstract

The discovery of RET fusions in lung cancers has uncovered a new therapeutic target for patients whose tumors harbor these changes. In an unselected population of non–small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs), RET fusions are present in 1% to 2% of cases. This incidence increases substantially, however, in never-smokers with lung adenocarcinomas that lack other known driver oncogenes. Although preclinical data provide experimental support for the use of RET inhibitors in the treatment of RET fusion-positive tumors, clinical data on response are lacking. We report preliminary data for the first three patients treated with the RET inhibitor cabozantinib on a prospective phase II trial for patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLCs (NCT01639508). Confirmed partial responses were observed in 2 patients, including one harboring a novel TRIM33–RET fusion. A third patient with a KIF5B–RET fusion has had prolonged stable disease approaching 8 months (31 weeks). All three patients remain progression-free on treatment. Significance: Driver oncogene discovery in lung cancers has dramatically changed today's therapeutic landscape. This report of the activity of cabozantinib in RET fusion-positive disease provides early clinical validation of RET fusions as drivers in lung cancers and suggests that RET inhibition may represent a new treatment paradigm in this molecular cohort. Cancer Discov; 3(6); 630–5. ©2013 AACR. See related commentary by Gainor and Shaw, p. 604 This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 591

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-13-0035

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 464

Metadata

Authors
Drilon, A., Wang, L., Hasanovic, A., Suehara, Y., Lipson, D., Stephens, P., Ross, J., Miller, V., Ginsberg, M., Zakowski, M. F., Kris, M. G., Ladanyi, M., & Rizvi, N.
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2013-06-01
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
630-635
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W2132578211
Cited by
464
References
4
FWCI
55.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response to Cabozantinib in Patients with RET Fusion-Positive Lung Adenocarcinomas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-13-0035
The paper
Drilon, A., Wang, L., Hasanovic, A., Suehara, Y., Lipson, D., Stephens, P., Ross, J., Miller, V., Ginsberg, M., Zakowski, M. F., Kris, M. G., Ladanyi, M., & Rizvi, N. (2013). Response to Cabozantinib in Patients with RET Fusion-Positive Lung Adenocarcinomas. Cancer Discovery. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-13-0035

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.