Cited by 68Melanoma and MAPK PathwaysPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

PI3′-Kinase Inhibition Forestalls the Onset of MEK1/2 Inhibitor Resistance in BRAF -Mutated Melanoma

Open access
Deuker, Marian M., Marsh Durban, Victoria, Phillips, Wayne A., McMahon, Martin·2015·Cancer Discovery

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Phosphatidylinositide 3′ (PI3′)-lipid signaling cooperates with oncogenic BRAFV600E to promote melanomagenesis. Sustained PI3′-lipid production commonly occurs via silencing of the PI3′-lipid phosphatase PTEN or, less commonly, through mutational activation of PIK3CA, encoding the 110-kDa catalytic subunit of PI3′-kinase-α (PI3Kα). To define the PI3K catalytic isoform dependency of BRAF-mutated melanoma, we used pharmacologic, isoform-selective PI3K inhibitors in conjunction with melanoma-derived cell lines and genetically engineered mouse (GEM) models. Although BRAFV600E/PIK3CAH1047R melanomas were sensitive to the antiproliferative effects of selective PI3Kα blockade, inhibition of BRAFV600E/PTENNull melanoma proliferation required combined blockade of PI3Kα, PI3Kδ, and PI3Kγ, and was insensitive to PI3Kβ blockade. In GEM models, isoform-selective PI3K inhibition elicited cytostatic effects, but significantly potentiated melanoma regression in response to BRAFV600E pathway–targeted inhibition. Interestingly, PI3K inhibition forestalled the onset of MEK inhibitor resistance in two independent GEM models of BRAFV600E-driven melanoma. These results suggest that combination therapy with PI3K inhibitors may be a useful strategy to extend the duration of clinical response of patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma to BRAFV600E pathway–targeted therapies. Significance: Although BRAFV600E pathway–targeted therapies elicit melanoma regression, the onset of drug resistance limits the durability of response. Here, we show that combined treatment with PI3K inhibitors significantly forestalled the onset of MEK1/2 inhibitor–resistant disease in BRAF-mutated GEM melanoma models. These results provide a conceptual framework for the combined deployment of BRAFV600E plus PI3K pathway–targeted inhibitors in the treatment of a subset of patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma. Cancer Discov; 5(2); 143–53. ©2014 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 97

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-14-0856

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The APOE variants exert cell-intrinsic effects on melanoma that impact primary tumor growth and metastatic capacity in a BrafV600E-driven GEMM.

    “We reveal that the APOE variants exert cell-intrinsic effects on melanoma that impact primary tumor growth and metastatic capacity in a BrafV600E-driven GEMM, a model that has provided numerous important insights into melanoma biology (12,38–40).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]McArthur GC Robert PBC Improved survival with vemurafenib in BRAFV600E and BRAFV600K mutation-positive melanoma Lancet Oncol 2014 In Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deuker, M. M., Marsh Durban, V., Phillips, W. A., & McMahon, M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • 1Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Cell and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU)
Corresponding author
McMahon, Martin
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2015-02-01
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
143-153
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W2136938899
Cited by
60
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (CA176839, R01CA176839)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM064337)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
PI3K inhibition, BRAF-mutant melanoma, MEK inhibitor resistance, PI3Kα, PI3Kδ, PI3Kγ, PTEN loss, PIK3CA mutation, combination therapy, melanoma regression
MeSH terms
Animals, Carbamates, Humans, Melanoma, Melanoma, Experimental, Random Allocation, Sulfonamides, Thiazoles, MAP Kinase Signaling System, Cell Line, Tumor, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, MAP Kinase Kinase 1, MAP Kinase Kinase 2, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Cell Proliferation, PTEN Phosphohydrolase, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review