Cited by 2Gut microbiota and healthOral microbiology and periodontitis researchCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

Cancer and the Metaorganism

Open access
Zitvogel, Laurence, Kroemer, Guido·2024·Cancer Discovery

Abstract

Summary: Pathogenic shifts in the gut microbiota are part of the “ecological” alterations that accompany tumor progression and compromise immunosurveillance. The future management of health and disease including cancer will rely on the diagnosis of such shifts and their therapeutic correction by general or personalized strategies, hence restoring metaorganismal homeostasis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-1484

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A central distinction between eubiosis and dysbiosis is the level of ecological diversity: eubiotic individuals typically harbor a richly diverse and stable microbial ecosystem, whereas dysbiosis is often marked by reduced diversity and compositional instability.

    “Indeed, a central distinction between eubiosis and dysbiosis is the level of ecological diversity: eubiotic individuals typically harbor a richly diverse and stable microbial ecosystem, whereas dysbiosis is often marked by reduced diversity and compositional instability.162”

    From Gut dysbiosis in oncology: a risk factor for immunoresistance (2026) · cites this paper as [162]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zitvogel, L., & Kroemer, G.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Zitvogel, Laurence
  • Kroemer, Guido
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2024-04-04
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
658-662
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W4393943469
Cited by
2
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  • Seerave Foundation
  • Equipex
  • European Commission (101095604, HORIZON2020, ERC-2021-ADG)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-21-ESRE-0028, ANR-23-RHUS-0010, ANR-23-CE44-0030, ANR18, ANR-21-RHUS-0017, ANR-23-R4HC-0006, ANR-18-IDEX-0001, ANR-22-CE14-0066)
  • Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
  • Ligue Contre le Cancer
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (UMS3655)
  • Institut Universitaire de France (ANR-18-IDEX-0001)
  • Institut National Du Cancer
  • Cancéropôle Ile de France
  • European Organisation for Rare Diseases
  • Université de Paris (ANR-18- IDEX-0001, 18-IDEX-0001)
  • Labex Immuno-Oncology ((ANR-18-IDEX-0001))
  • HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (101052444)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Keywords
gut microbiota, metaorganism, cancer, tumor progression, immune surveillance, ecological change, personalized treatment, microbiota-based therapy
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Homeostasis, Humans, Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review