Cited by 28Immunotherapy and Immune ResponsesCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkersvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

PGV001, a Multi-Peptide Personalized Neoantigen Vaccine Platform: Phase I Study in Patients with Solid and Hematologic Malignancies in the Adjuvant Setting

Saxena, Mansi, Marron, Thomas U., Kodysh, Julia, Finnigan, John P., Onkar, Sayali, Kaminska, Anna, Tuballes, Kevin, Guo, Ruiwei +29 more·2025·Cancer Discovery

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Significance The PGV001 platform is feasible, safe, and immunogenic. The OpenVax pipeline predicted immunogenic neoantigens in tumors with wide-ranging mutational burdens. Data from this study prompted three additional PGV001 trials, one in newly diagnosed glioblastoma, one in urothelial cancer in combination with an ICI, and another in prostate cancer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-24-0934

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PGV001 showed evidence of robust immune activation in patients with high-risk melanoma and multiple myeloma.

    “For example, a single-arm, open-label, proof-of-concept Phase I study of PGV001 (NCT02721043ii), a multipeptide personalized neoantigen vaccine platform, demonstrated the safety of computationally guided neoantigen selection and vaccine formulation, with evidence of robust immune activation in patients with high-risk melanoma and multiple myeloma [130]”
  • Phage-based cancer vaccines and related viral/phage-derived platforms have progressed from preclinical proof-of-concept studies into a limited number of Phase I/II clinical trials.

    “To date, phage-based cancer vaccines and related viral/phage-derived platforms have progressed from preclinical proof-of-concept studies into a limited number of Phase I/II clinical trials, primarily designed to evaluate safety, feasibility, and preliminary immunogenicity in both solid and hematological malignancies.”
  • A single-arm, open-label, proof-of-concept Phase I study of PGV001 (NCT02721043) demonstrated the safety of computationally guided neoantigen selection and vaccine formulation.

    “For example, a single-arm, open-label, proof-of-concept Phase I study of PGV001 (NCT02721043ii), a multipeptide personalized neoantigen vaccine platform, demonstrated the safety of computationally guided neoantigen selection and vaccine formulation, with evidence of robust immune activation in patients with high-risk melanoma and multiple myeloma [130]”
  • These Phase I/II trials are primarily designed to evaluate safety, feasibility, and preliminary immunogenicity in both solid and hematological malignancies.

    “To date, phage-based cancer vaccines and related viral/phage-derived platforms have progressed from preclinical proof-of-concept studies into a limited number of Phase I/II clinical trials, primarily designed to evaluate safety, feasibility, and preliminary immunogenicity in both solid and hematological malignancies.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saxena, M., Marron, T. U., Kodysh, J., Finnigan, J. P., Onkar, S., Kaminska, A., Tuballes, K., Guo, R., Sabado, R. L., Meseck, M., O’Donnell, T. J., Sebra, R. P., Parekh, S., Galsky, M. D., Blasquez, A., Gimenez, G., Bicak, M., Cimen Bozkus, C., Delbeau-Zagelbaum, D., Rodriguez, D., Acuna-Villaorduna, A., Misiukiewicz, K. J., Posner, M. R., Miles, B. A., Irie, H. Y., Tiersten, A., Doroshow, D. B., Wolf, A., Mandeli, J., Brody, R., Salazar, A. M., Gnjatic, S., Hammerbacher, J., Schadt, E., Friedlander, P., Rubinsteyn, A., & Bhardwaj, N.
Affiliations
  • Tisch Cancer Institute (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Genentech (US)
  • 2Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
  • 1Vaccine and Cell Therapy Laboratory, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
  • Tampa General Hospital (US)
  • Northwell Health (US)
  • 6Oncovir, Inc., Winchester, Virginia.
  • 3Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
  • Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy (US)
Corresponding author
Bhardwaj, Nina
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2025-03-17
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
930-947
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W4408505242
Cited by
28
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 9
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Lake Champlain Cancer Research Organization (CRI-CLIP)
  • Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
personalized neoantigen vaccine, multipeptide vaccine, adjuvant immunotherapy, solid tumors, hematologic malignancies, T cell response, B cell response, immune checkpoint inhibitors, tumor mutational burden
MeSH terms
Antigens, Neoplasm, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Hematologic Neoplasms, Cancer Vaccines, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review