Cited by 2,488Immunotherapy and Immune ResponsesCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkersvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Personalized RNA mutanome vaccines mobilize poly-specific therapeutic immunity against cancer

Sahin, Ugur, Derhovanessian, Evelyna, Miller, Matthias, Kloke, Björn-Philipp, Simon, Petra, Löwer, Martin, Bukur, Valesca, Tadmor, Arbel D. +42 more·2017·Nature

Abstract

T cells directed against mutant neo-epitopes drive cancer immunity. However, spontaneous immune recognition of mutations is inefficient. We recently introduced the concept of individualized mutanome vaccines and implemented an RNA-based poly-neo-epitope approach to mobilize immunity against a spectrum of cancer mutations. Here we report the first-in-human application of this concept in melanoma. We set up a process comprising comprehensive identification of individual mutations, computational prediction of neo-epitopes, and design and manufacturing of a vaccine unique for each patient. All patients developed T cell responses against multiple vaccine neo-epitopes at up to high single-digit percentages. Vaccine-induced T cell infiltration and neo-epitope-specific killing of autologous tumour cells were shown in post-vaccination resected metastases from two patients. The cumulative rate of metastatic events was highly significantly reduced after the start of vaccination, resulting in a sustained progression-free survival. Two of the five patients with metastatic disease experienced vaccine-related objective responses. One of these patients had a late relapse owing to outgrowth of β2-microglobulin-deficient melanoma cells as an acquired resistance mechanism. A third patient developed a complete response to vaccination in combination with PD-1 blockade therapy. Our study demonstrates that individual mutations can be exploited, thereby opening a path to personalized immunotherapy for patients with cancer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature23003

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intranodal vaccination with free mRNA encoding ten neoepitopes of 13 patients with metastatic melanoma generated T cell immunity against multiple neoepitopes in all patients.

    “For example, intranodal vaccination with free mRNA encoding ten neoepitopes of 13 patients with metastatic melanoma generated T cell immunity against multiple neoepitopes in all patients209.”

    From Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery (2021) · cites this paper as [209]

  • A first-in-human trial demonstrated clinical feasibility and safety of personalized mRNA cancer vaccines for advanced melanoma, with all vaccinated patients developing CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses against selected antigens and some showing objective antitumor responses.

    “A first-in-human trial demonstrated the clinical feasibility and safety of this approach for advanced melanoma cancers: all vaccinated patients developed CD4 + and CD8 + T cell responses against the selected antigens, with some patients showing objective antitumor responses [15].”

    From Three decades of messenger RNA vaccine development (2019) · cites this paper as [15]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sahin, U., Derhovanessian, E., Miller, M., Kloke, B.-P., Simon, P., Löwer, M., Bukur, V., Tadmor, A. D., Luxemburger, U., Schrörs, B., Omokoko, T., Vormehr, M., Albrecht, C., Paruzynski, A., Kuhn, A. N., Buck, J., Heesch, S., Schreeb, K. H., Müller, F., Ortseifer, I., Vogler, I., Godehardt, E., Attig, S., Rae, R., Breitkreuz, A., Tolliver, C., Suchan, M., Martic, G., Hohberger, A., Sorn, P., Diekmann, J., Ciesla, J., Waksmann, O., Brück, A.-K., Witt, M., Zillgen, M., Rothermel, A., Kasemann, B., Langer, D., Bolte, S., Diken, M., Kreiter, S., Nemecek, R., Gebhardt, C., Grabbe, S., Höller, C., Utikal, J., Huber, C., Loquai, C., & Türeci, Ö.
Affiliations
  • BioNTech (Germany) (DE)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
Venue
Nature
Published
2017-07-05
Volume
547
Issue
7662
Pages
222-226
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2724264513
Cited by
2,488
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 228 · 2025: 255 · 2024: 259 · 2023: 299 · 2022: 277 · 2021: 317 · 2020: 290 · 2019: 262 · 2018: 239 · 2017: 58 · 2015: 1
FWCI
105.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
neoantigens, melanoma, cancer immunotherapy, T cell response, metastasis prevention, anti-PD-1 therapy, acquired resistance, beta2-microglobulin deficiency, vaccine safety and tolerability, tumor cell killing, tumor-infiltrating T cells
MeSH terms
Nivolumab, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Epitopes, beta 2-Microglobulin, Humans, Immunotherapy, Melanoma, Mutation, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, RNA, T-Lymphocytes, Vaccination, CD8 Antigens, Cancer Vaccines, Precision Medicine, B7-H1 Antigen, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review