Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Embryotoxicity Screening Using Embryonic Stem Cells in vitro: Correlation to in vivo Teratogenicity

Scholz, Gabriele, Pohl, Ingeborg, Genschow, Elke, Klemm, Martina, Spielmann, Horst·1999·Cells Tissues Organs

Abstract

Blastocyst-derived pluripotent embryonic stem (ES) cells of the mouse can be induced to differentiate in culture into a variety of cell types, including cardiac muscle cells. The embryonic stem cell test that makes use of the differentiation of ES cells into cardiomyocytes in a standardized in vitro model was developed to offer an alternative method to comprehensive in vivo studies in reproductive toxicology about toxic effects of chemicals. ES cells of the mouse cell line D3 are investigated for their preserved capability to differentiate following drug exposure, and both ES cells and differentiated fibroblast cells of the mouse cell line 3T3 are comparatively analyzed for effects on viability. The following endpoints are used to classify the embryotoxic potential of chemicals into three classes of in vitro embryotoxicity (non-, weakly or strongly embryotoxic). These endpoints are: (1) the inhibition of differentiation of ES cells into cardiomyocytes after 10 days of treatment, and the decrease of viability (cytotoxicity) of (2) 3T3 cells and (3) ES cells after 10 days of treatment, determined by a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) test. 50% inhibition concentrations for differentiation (ID 50) and cytotoxicity (IC 50 D3 and IC 50 3T3) are calculated from concentration-response curves. Applying linear analysis of discriminance, a biostatistical prediction model (PM) was developed. This procedure identified three variables, the lg(IC 50 D3), the lg(IC 50 3T3) and the relative distance between IC 50 3T3 and ID 50, that improved the separation of the three classes of embryotoxicity compared to the prediction model that was originally proposed after test development. Unlike the orginal PM, the improved PM incorporates as one variable the relative distance between IC 50 3T3 and ID 50, instead of the ratio ID 50/IC 50 D3 that was used previously.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000016700

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 159

Metadata

Authors
Scholz, G., Pohl, I., Genschow, E., Klemm, M., & Spielmann, H.
Venue
Cells Tissues Organs
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
1999
Volume
165
Issue
3-4
Pages
203-211
ISSN
  • 1422-6405 (ISSN-L)
  • 1422-6421
OpenAlex
W1981457253
Cited by
159
References
0
FWCI
8.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Embryotoxicity Screening Using Embryonic Stem Cells in vitro: Correlation to in vivo Teratogenicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000016700
The paper
Scholz, G., Pohl, I., Genschow, E., Klemm, M., & Spielmann, H. (1999). Embryotoxicity Screening Using Embryonic Stem Cells in vitro: Correlation to in vivo Teratogenicity. Cells Tissues Organs. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016700

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.