Effects of 1-Year Ipriflavone Treatment on Lumbar Bone Mineral Density and Bone Metabolic Markers in PostmenopausalWomen with Low Bo ne Mass
Abstract
In vitro studies have shown that ipriflavone affects both bone formation and bone resorption, but the effect in early-stage postmenopausal women with low bone mass and a high turnover of bone metabolism is unknown. In this prospective study, we randomly assigned 60 patients with postmenopausal osteopenia or osteoporosis to receive either 600 mg/day of ipriflavone or 0.8 g/day calcium lactate, and compared the effects on bone mineral density (BMD) from the 2nd to 4th lumbar vertebrae (L2-4) and bone metabolic markers before and after one year of treatment. In the iprifravone-treated (IP) group, L2-4 BMD was similar before and after treatment (0.78 and 0.77 g/cm(2), respectively), but in the calcium lactate-treated (CL) group, L2-4 BMD decreased significantly from 0.81 to 0.79 g/cm(2) after 1 year of treatment (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the rate of the decrease in L2-4 BMD was significantly greater in the CL group than in the IP group (p < 0.01). The median deoxypyridinoline (Dpd) level was significantly lower after 1 year of treatment (5.8 mmol/mmol creatinine [Cr]) than the baseline value (10.2 mmol/mmol Cr) in the IP, but not in the CL group, suggesting that IP treatment suppresses bone resorption.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The only beneficial effect of methoxyisoflavone reported in multiple research publications and U.S. patents is reduced bone resorption and prevention of bone loss.
“Despite these claims, the only beneficial effect of methoxyisoflavone that has been reported in multiple research publications and U.S. patents is the benefits of reduced bone resorption and bone loss prevention [2-4].”
From Effects of methoxyisoflavone, ecdysterone, and sulfo-polysaccharide supplementation on training adaptations in resistance-trained males (2006) · cites this paper as [3]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wilborn, C. D., Taylor, L. W., Campbell, B. I., Kerksick, C., Rasmussen, C. J., Greenwood, M., & Kreider, R. B. (2006) · Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · doi:10.1186/1550-2783-3-2-19 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ohta, H., Komukai, S., Makita, K., Masuzawa, T., & Nozawa, S.
- Affiliations
- Keio University (JP)
- ORCID
- Ohta, Hiroaki
- Venue
- Hormone Research in Paediatrics
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 178-183
- ISSN
- 1663-2818 (ISSN-L)
- 1663-2826
- OpenAlex
- W1968812789
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Hormone Research in Paediatrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
- Keywords
- ipriflavone, postmenopausal osteoporosis, postmenopausal osteopenia, lumbar spine bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, deoxypyridinoline, bone resorption, calcium lactate, bone turnover, osteopenia
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Bone Diseases, Metabolic, Female, Humans, Isoflavones, Lumbar Vertebrae, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Bone Density, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Postmenopause
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review