Cited by 74

Association of Cigarette Smoking with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Kamel, Freja, Umbach, David M., Munsat, Theodore L., Shefner, Jeremy M., Sandler, Dale P.·1999·Neuroepidemiology

Abstract

We explored the relationship between amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and cigarette smoking in a case-control study conducted in New England from 1993 to 1996. Recently diagnosed ALS cases (n = 109) were recruited from two major referral centers. Population controls (n = 256) were identified by random telephone screening. Data were analyzed by logistic regression. After adjusting for age, sex, region and education, ever having smoked cigarettes was associated with an increase in risk for ALS (odds ratio 1.7; 95% confidence interval 1.0–2.8). Average cigarettes smoked per day, years smoked and pack-years were all greater in cases than controls, but dose-response trends were not observed. Similar numbers of cases and controls had ever used alcohol, and only a small, nonsignificant association of drinks per month with ALS was observed. The association of cigarette smoking with ALS was not affected by adjusting for alcohol use. In contrast, the weak relationship of ALS with alcohol use was apparently due to confounding by smoking.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000026211

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kamel, F., Umbach, D. M., Munsat, T. L., Shefner, J. M., & Sandler, D. P.
Venue
Neuroepidemiology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
1999
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
194-202
ISSN
  • 0251-5350
  • 1423-0208
Cited by
74
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review