The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fatigue after Stroke: A Major but Neglected Issue
Abstract
Subjective fatigue, defined as a feeling of early exhaustion developing during mental activity, with weariness, lack of energy and aversion to effort, remains virtually unstudied in patients with stroke, bur recent surveys suggest that it is a major, commonly overlooked, stroke sequela. While the few existing series did not show significant correlations between fatigue and stroke severity, lesion location, cognitive and neurological impairment and depression, recent neurobehavioral studies have highlighted an association between fatigue and brainstem and thalamic lesions. This suggests that fatigue may be linked to the interruption of neural networks involved in tonic attention, such as the reticular activating system. In fact, several subtypes of fatigue may develop after stroke, in connection with cognitive sequelae, neurological impairment, psychological factors and sleep disorders. A challenge is to identify and delineate these different subtypes and to distinguish them from mood disorders, which frequently coexist. We emphasize the concept of ‘primary’ poststroke fatigue, which may develop in the absence of depression or a significant cognitive sequela, and which may be linked to attentional deficits resulting from specific damage to the reticular formation and related structures involved in the subcortical attentional network. In the patients with excellent neurological and neuropsychological recovery, poststroke fatigue may be the only persisting sequela, which may severely limit their return to previous activities. The recognition of poststroke fatigue may be critical during recovery and rehabilitation after stroke.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hamilton, M. (1960) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · Cited by 32,817
Development of a Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale
Williams, L. S., Weinberger, M., Harris, L. E., Clark, D. O., & Biller, J. (1999) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.30.7.1362 · Cited by 914
Neurasthenia, or Nervous Exhaustion
Beard, G. (1869) · The Boston Medical and Surgical Journal · doi:10.1056/nejm186904290801301 · Cited by 412
Cited by
Fatigue in neurological disorders
Chaudhuri, A., & Behan, P. O. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)15794-2 · Cited by 1,297
Johansson, B., Bjuhr, H., & Rönnbäck, L. (2012) · Brain Injury · doi:10.3109/02699052.2012.700082 · Cited by 218
Naess, H., Lunde, L., & Brogger, J. (2012) · Vascular Health and Risk Management · doi:10.2147/vhrm.s32780 · Cited by 171
Model of understanding fatigue after stroke
Wu, S., Mead, G., Macleod, M., & Chalder, T. (2015) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.114.006647 · Cited by 169
Frequency and natural history of fatigue after stroke: A systematic review of longitudinal studies
Duncan, F., Wu, S., & Mead, G. E. (2012) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.04.001 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Staub, F., & Bogousslavsky, J.
- Venue
- Cerebrovascular Diseases
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 75-81
- ISSN
- 1015-9770 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9786
- OpenAlex
- W2095567866
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fatigue after Stroke: A Major but Neglected Issue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000047685
- The paper
- Staub, F., & Bogousslavsky, J. (2001). Fatigue after Stroke: A Major but Neglected Issue. Cerebrovascular Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1159/000047685
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.