The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Lesion Size on the Diagnostic Performance of Dermoscopy in Melanoma Detection
Abstract
Background: Dermoscopy is able to correctly classify a higher number of melanomas than naked-eye examination. Little is known however about factors which may influence the diagnostic performance during practice. The aim of the study was to analyze the effect of size of the lesion on diagnostic performance of dermoscopy in melanoma detection. Methods: Eight dermatologists examined clinical and, separately, clinical and dermoscopic (combined examination) images of 200 melanocytic lesions previously excised [64 melanomas, 24 in situ and 40 invasive (median thickness 0.30 mm) and 136 melanocytic nevi]. After examination, diagnostic performance was analyzed in accordance with the major diameter of the lesions divided into 3 groups, i.e. small (less than 6 mm), intermediate (between 6 and 9 mm) and large (10 mm or more) lesions. These groups were shown to be highly comparable concerning the microstaging of melanomas (median thickness value 0.30, 0.22 and 0.32 mm, respectively). Results: Dermoscopy increased the diagnostic performance of naked-eye examination of both intermediate and large lesions [sensitivity value: +19.3 (p = 0.002) and +10.3 (p = 0.007); diagnostic accuracy value: +7.4 (p = 0.004) and +6.1 (p = 0.07)]. On the contrary, no statistically significant increase was found dealing with small lesions (sensitivity +3.7, p = 0.66; diagnostic accuracy –1.7, p = 0.55). Conclusions: The diagnostic improvement associated with the addition of dermoscopy to naked-eye examination is influenced by the size of the lesion, i.e. it is lacking with lesions up to 6 mm in diameter. The optimized use of dermoscopy in melanoma detection is obtained dealing with melanocytic lesions 6 mm in diameter or larger.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, it is unclear if dermoscopy is helpful in assessing melanomas smaller than 6 mm33,55,56.”
From Dermoscopy practice guidelines for use in telemedicine (2022) · cites this paper as [56]
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy
Kittler, H., Pehamberger, H., Wolff, K., & Binder, M. (2002) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(02)00679-4 · Cited by 1,349
Epiluminescence Microscopy for the Diagnosis of Doubtful Melanocytic Skin Lesions
Argenziano, G., Fabbrocini, G., Carli, P., GIORGI, V. D., Sammarco, E., & Delfino, M. (1998) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.134.12.1563 · Cited by 898
Self-citationPehamberger, H., Steiner, A., & Wolff, K. (1987) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/s0190-9622(87)70239-4 · Cited by 634
Bafounta, M.-L., Beauchet, A., Aegerter, P., & Saïag, P. (2001) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.137.10.1343 · Cited by 502
NIH Consensus conference. Diagnosis and treatment of early melanoma
Goldsmith, L. A., Askin, F. B., Chang, A. E., et al. (1992) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.268.10.1314 · Cited by 316
The ABCD Rule of Dermatoscopy Does Not Apply to Small Melanocytic Skin Lesions
Pizzichetta, M. A., Talamini, R., Piccolo, D., Argenziano, G., Pagnanelli, G., Burgdorf, T., Lombardi, D., Trevisan, G., Veronesi, A., Carbone, A., et al. (2001) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.137.10.1376-a · Cited by 75
Small-diameter malignant melanoma: A common diagnosis in New South Wales, Australia
Shaw, H. M., & McCarthy, W. H. (1992) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/0190-9622(92)70236-9 · Cited by 72
Reliability and inter-observer agreement of dermoscopic diagnosis of melanoma and melanocytic naevi
Carli, P., GIORGI, V. D., Naldi, L., & Dosi, G. (1998) · European Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.1097/00008469-199810000-00005 · Cited by 66
Self-citationDermoscopy and Early Diagnosis of Melanoma
Carli, P., GIORGI, V. D., & Giannotti, B. (2001) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.137.12.1641 · Cited by 51
Self-citationPouliot, F., & Labrie, C. (1999) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990331)81:1<118::aid-ijc20>3.0.co;2-5 · Cited by 36
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990331)81:1<62::AID-IJC12>3.0.CO;2-2 · DOI
Cited by
Dermoscopy practice guidelines for use in telemedicine
Deda, L. C., Goldberg, R. H., Jamerson, T. A., Lee, I., & Tejasvi, T. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00587-9 · Cited by 43
Koelink, C. J. L., Jonkman, M. F., Van Der Meer, K., & Van Der Heide, W. K. (2014) · European Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1684/ejd.2014.2275 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Carli, P., De Giorgi, V., Chiarugi, A., Nardini, P., Mannone, F., Stante, M., Quercioli, E., Sestini, S., & Giannotti, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Florence (IT)
- Venue
- Dermatology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 206
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 292-296
- ISSN
- 1018-8665 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9832
- OpenAlex
- W2053838010
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses (vor)
- www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses (tdm)
- Locations
- Dermatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Keywords
- dermoscopy, melanoma detection, lesion size, melanocytic lesions, melanoma thickness, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, melanocytic nevi, melanoma in situ, microstaging
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Melanoma, Microscopy, Sensitivity and Specificity, Skin Neoplasms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Lesion Size on the Diagnostic Performance of Dermoscopy in Melanoma Detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000069939
- The paper
- Carli, P., De Giorgi, V., Chiarugi, A., Nardini, P., Mannone, F., Stante, M., Quercioli, E., Sestini, S., & Giannotti, B. (2003). Effect of Lesion Size on the Diagnostic Performance of Dermoscopy in Melanoma Detection. Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000069939
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.