Cited by 67Physiological and biochemical adaptationsEvolution and Paleontology StudiesPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Brain Size Scaling and Body Composition in Mammals

Schoenemann, P. Thomas·2004·Brain, Behavior and Evolution

Abstract

Brain size scales with body size across large groups of animals, but exactly why this should be the case has not been resolved. It is generally assumed that body size is a general proxy for some more important or specific underlying variable, such as metabolic resources available, surface area of the body, or total muscle mass (which is more extensively innervated than is, e.g., adipose tissue). The present study tests whether brain size in mammals scales more closely with muscle mass (and other components of lean body mass) than with total fat. Felsenstein’s independent comparisons method was used to control for phylogenetic effects on body composition in organ weight data taken from a previously published comparative sample of 39 species in 8 different orders of mammals, all collected and processed by the same researchers. The analysis shows that the size of the central nervous system (CNS) is more closely associated with components of fat-free weight than it is to fat weight. These results suggest a possible explanation for why metabolic resources and brain size both share the same general relationship with body size across mammals. They also suggest that some measure of lean body mass is a more appropriate scaling parameter for comparing brain size across species than is overall body weight.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000073759

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schoenemann, P. T.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Schoenemann, P. Thomas
Venue
Brain, Behavior and Evolution
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2003-12-19
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
47-60
ISSN
  • 0006-8977 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9743
OpenAlex
W2116238980
Cited by
67
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
brain size, body size scaling, body composition, muscle mass, fat mass, lean body mass, central nervous system, phylogenetic control, comparative anatomy, mammals
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Composition, Body Weight, Brain, Mammals, Models, Biological, Organ Size, Phylogeny, Species Specificity, Statistics as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review