Effects of Long-Term Intervention with Lactobacillus helveticus-Fermented Milk on Bone Mineral Density and Bone Mineral Content in Growing Rats
Abstract
Background:Lactobacillus helveticus-fermented milk has been shown to increase calcium absorption compared to ordinary sour milk. In the present study the possible effect of L. helveticus-fermented milk on bone was studied in growing rats. Methods: Spontaneously hypertensive male rats, which develop an osteoporotic bone disorder with age, were randomized into 5 groups (n = 10) receiving milk fermented with L. helveticus 16H and, as reference drinks, milk fermented with L. helveticus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, sour milk, skim milk or water, for 14 weeks. After the intervention bone mineral density and bone mineral content were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The femur weight, length and volume were measured before ashing. From the ashes the weight and mineral content were assessed. Results: As the body weight gain differed significantly between the groups, the results were related to the body weight. The L. helveticus-fermented milk intervention significantly increased the bone mineral density and bone mineral content compared to the sour milk, skim milk and water interventions. The mean values of the bone mineral density and bone mineral content were higher in the L. helveticus-fermented milk group compared to the Saccharomyces-fermented milk group but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion:L. helveticus-fermented milk increases bone mineral density and bone mineral content in relation to body weight in the long-term feeding of growing rats. The mechanism of L. helveticus remains to be discovered.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Milk fermented with L. helveticus 16H was shown to increase bone mineral density and bone mineral content in growing rats.
“Milk fermented with L. helveticus 16H was also shown to increase bone mineral density and bone mineral content in growing rats (Narva et al., 2004a).”
From Lactobacillus helveticus: the proteolytic system (2013) · cites this paper as Narva et al., 2004a
Cites
Hatton, R., Stimpel, M., & Chambers, T. J. (1997) · Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1677/joe.0.1520005 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scholz-Ahrens, K. E., Ade, P., Marten, B., Weber, P., Timm, W., Asil, Y., Glüer, C.-C., & Schrezenmeir, J. (2007) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/137.3.838s · Cited by 591 · see citing works
The gut-bone axis: How bacterial metabolites bridge the distance
Zaiss, M. M., Jones, R. M., Schett, G., & Pacifici, R. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci128521 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Production of Bioactive Peptides by Lactobacillus Species: From Gene to Application
Raveschot, C., Cudennec, B., Coutte, F., Flahaut, C., Fremont, M., Drider, D., & Dhulster, P. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02354 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Lactobacillus helveticus: the proteolytic system
Griffiths, M. W., & Tellez, A. M. (2013) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00030 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
“In the same study, milk fermented with a proteolytic-deficient variant of L helveticus L89 did not exert the same regulatory response observed in mice fed with milk fermented with R389 or L89.”
BackgroundInfluentialChiang, S.-S., & Pan, T.-M. (2011) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf2013716 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
From osteoimmunology to osteomicrobiology: How the microbiota and the immune system regulate bone
Hsu, E., & Pacifici, R. (2018) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/s00223-017-0321-0 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Bone Remodeling and the Microbiome
Pacifici, R. (2018) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a031203 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
- Authors
- Narva, M., Collin, M., Lamberg-Allardt, C., Kärkkäinen, M., Poussa, T., Vapaatalo, H., & Korpela, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Venue
- Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 228-234
- ISSN
- 0250-6807 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9697
- OpenAlex
- W1987093863
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
- Keywords
- Lactobacillus helveticus, fermented milk, bone mineral density, bone mineral content, osteoporosis, calcium absorption, growing rats, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, body weight, femur
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bone and Bones, Femur, Fermentation, Lactobacillus, Male, Random Allocation, Rats, Inbred SHR, Saccharomyces, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Cultured Milk Products, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review