The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fruit and Vegetable Intake in a Sample of 11-Year-Old Children in 9 European Countries: The Pro Children Cross-Sectional Survey
Open accessAbstract
Background/Aims: An adequate fruit and vegetable intake provides essential nutrients and nutritive compounds and is considered an important part of a healthy lifestyle. No simple instrument has been available for the assessment of fruit and vegetable intake as well as its determinants in school-aged children applicable in different European countries. Within the Pro Children Project, such an instrument has been developed. This paper describes the cross-sectional survey in 11-year-olds in 9 countries. Methods: The cross-sectional survey used nationally, and in 2 countries regionally, representative samples of schools and classes. The questionnaires, including a precoded 24-hour recall component and a food frequency part, were completed in the classroom. Data were treated using common syntax files for portion sizes and for merging of vegetable types into four subgroups. Results: The results show that the fruit and vegetable intake in amounts and choice were highly diverse in the 9 participating countries. Vegetable intake was in general lower than fruit intake, boys consumed less fruit and vegetables than girls did. The highest total intake according to the 24-hour recall was found in Austria and Portugal, the lowest in Spain and Iceland. Conclusion: The fruit and vegetable intake in 11-year-old children was in all countries far from reaching population goals and food-based dietary guidelines on national and international levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cognitive development and children's perceptions of fruit and vegetables; a qualitative study
Zeinstra, G. G., Koelen, M. A., Kok, F. J., & de Graaf, C. (2007) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-4-30 · Cited by 208
Wyse, R. J., Wolfenden, L., Campbell, E., Brennan, L., Campbell, K. J., Fletcher, A., Bowman, J., Heard, T. R., & Wiggers, J. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-216 · Cited by 178
de Sa, J., & Lock, K. (2008) · The European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckn061 · Cited by 158
Vegetables and other core food groups: A comparison of key flavour and texture properties
Poelman, A. A. M., Delahunty, C. M., & de Graaf, C. (2017) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.09.004 · Cited by 77
Varman, S. D., Cliff, D. P., Jones, R. A., Hammersley, M. L., Zhang, Z., Charlton, K., & Kelly, B. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph182010824 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Yngve, A., Wolf, A., Poortvliet, E., Elmadfa, I., Brug, J., Ehrenblad, B., Franchini, B., Haraldsdóttir, J., Krølner, R., Maes, L., Pérez-Rodrigo, C., Sjöström, M., Thórsdóttir, I., & Klepp, K.-I.
- Venue
- Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 236-245
- ISSN
- 0250-6807 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9697
- OpenAlex
- W2170456131
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fruit and Vegetable Intake in a Sample of 11-Year-Old Children in 9 European Countries: The Pro Children Cross-Sectional Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000087247
- The paper
- Yngve, A., Wolf, A., Poortvliet, E., Elmadfa, I., Brug, J., Ehrenblad, B., Franchini, B., Haraldsdóttir, J., Krølner, R., Maes, L., Pérez-Rodrigo, C., Sjöström, M., Thórsdóttir, I., & Klepp, K.-I. (2005). Fruit and Vegetable Intake in a Sample of 11-Year-Old Children in 9 European Countries: The Pro Children Cross-Sectional Survey. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1159/000087247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.