Cited by 72Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, DietSchool Health and Nursing Education

Experiential Learning Interventions and Healthy Eating Outcomes in Children: A Systematic Literature Review

Open access
Varman, Sumantla D., Cliff, Dylan P., Jones, Rachel A., Hammersley, Megan L., Zhang, Zhiguang, Charlton, Karen, Kelly, Bridget·2021·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Experiential learning is the process where learners create meaning from direct experience. This systematic review aimed to examine the effects of experiential learning activities on dietary outcomes (knowledge, attitudes, behaviors) in children. Four databases: Education Research Complete, Scopus, Web of Science and PsychINFO were searched from database inception to 2020. Eligible studies included children 0–12 years, assessed effect of experiential learning on outcomes of interest compared to non-experiential learning and were open to any setting. The quality of studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool by two independent reviewers and effect size was calculated on each outcome. Nineteen studies were conducted in primary school, six in pre-school and one in an outside-of-school setting and used nine types of experiential learning strategies. Cooking, taste-testing, games, role-playing, and gardening were effective in improving nutrition outcomes in primary school children. Sensory evaluation, games, creative arts, and storybooks were effective for preschool children. Multiple strategies involving parents, and short/intense strategies are useful for intervention success. Experiential learning is a useful strategy to improve children’s knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors towards healthy eating. Fewer studies in pre-school and outside of school settings and high risk of bias may limit the generalizability and strength of the findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph182010824

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [27]Kolb D.A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development Pearson Education, Inc. Hoboken, NJ, USA 2014
  2. [29]Beloglovsky M. Daly L. Early Learning Theories Made Visible Redleaf Press St Paul, MN, USA 2015

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varman, S. D., Cliff, D. P., Jones, R. A., Hammersley, M. L., Zhang, Z., Charlton, K., & Kelly, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Varman, Sumantla D.
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-10-15
Volume
18
Issue
20
Pages
10824
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3207383977
Cited by
71
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51578130)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
experiential learning, healthy eating, children, nutrition knowledge, food attitudes, dietary habits, culinary education, taste testing, role play, gardening, sensory evaluation, creative arts, storybooks, parental involvement, elementary school students, preschool children
MeSH terms
Diet, Healthy, Child, Child, Preschool, Diet, Educational Status, Humans, Schools, Problem-Based Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review