The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Directions in the Assessment of Gastric Function: Clinical Applications of Physiologic Measurements
Abstract
A variety of methods exist to assess gastric motor and sensory function. Specific techniques allow for the measurement of emptying, contractility, accommodation and sensation. Several of these techniques are suitable for in-office use rather than in a hospital or gastroenterology laboratory. While gastric function tests continue to proliferate and become more clinically accessible, their relevance to specific digestive symptoms or syndromes remains poorly studied. Additionally, the ability of gastric function testing to guide therapy or predict responses to interventions also remains poorly studied. Gastric function testing should be employed cautiously in clinical practice with an awareness that test results represent observations rather than diagnosis.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Cecum pH decreases just below pH 6 and again increases in the colon and reaches pH 6.7 at the rectum.77”
From Current Advances in Chitosan Nanoparticles Based Oral Drug Delivery for Colorectal Cancer Treatment (2022) · cites this paper as [77]
Citations
Cites
Gastric accommodation and emptying in evaluation of patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms
Bredenoord, A. J., Chial, H. J., Camilleri, M., Mullan, B. P., & Murray, J. A. (2003) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s1542-3565(03)00130-7 · Cited by 243
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- 10.1053%2Fgast.2002.33584 · DOI
- 10.1046%2Fj.1365-2982.2003.00463.x · DOI
- 10.1016%2FS0016-5085%2898%2970155-6 · DOI
- 10.1097%2F00006231-199510000-00005 · DOI
- 10.1007%2FBF01297027 · DOI
- 10.1111%2Fj.1572-0241.2000.02076.x · DOI
- 10.1136%2Fgut.39.2.299 · DOI
- 10.1136%2Fgut.46.6.768 · DOI
- 10.2746%2F042516403775467423 · DOI
- 10.1016%2F0016-5085%2895%2990202-3 · DOI
- 10.1053%2Fgast.2001.28656 · DOI
- 10.1016%2FS0016-5085%2898%2970012-5 · DOI
- 10.1111%2Fj.1365-2982.2004.00588.x · DOI
- 10.1111%2Fj.1572-0241.2002.05421.x · DOI
- 10.1097%2F00004836-200411000-00006 · DOI
- 10.1023%2FA%3A1005434020310 · DOI
- 10.1046%2Fj.1365-2982.2003.00396.x · DOI
- 10.1111%2Fj.1365-2982.2004.00497.x · DOI
- 10.3109%2F00365529609094755 · DOI
- 10.1007%2FBF01295904 · DOI
- 10.1080%2F00365520410005964 · DOI
- 10.1097%2F00004836-199010000-00005 · DOI
- 10.1016%2F0016-5085%2895%2990199-X · DOI
- 10.1016%2F0016-5085%2895%2990685-1 · DOI
- 10.1136%2Fgut.44.1.106 · DOI
- 10.1053%2Fgast.2001.22441 · DOI
- 10.1136%2Fgut.2003.038588 · DOI
- 10.1046%2Fj.1365-2036.2002.01154.x · DOI
- 10.1023%2FA%3A1011098125916 · DOI
- 10.1111%2Fj.1572-0241.1999.01392.x · DOI
- 10.1136%2Fgut.52.11.1548 · DOI
- 10.1023%2FA%3A1005435804225 · DOI
- 10.1080%2F00365520410003560 · DOI
- 10.1023%2FA%3A1026609808495 · DOI
- 10.1111%2Fj.1572-0241.1999.01281.x · DOI
- 10.1053%2Fgast.2003.50155 · DOI
- 10.1111%2Fj.1572-0241.2001.03683.x · DOI
- 10.1111%2Fj.1572-0241.2004.30246.x · DOI
- 10.3109%2F00365529209000156 · DOI
- 10.1136%2Fgut.28.3.300 · DOI
- 10.1007%2FBF01540334 · DOI
- 10.1046%2Fj.1365-2036.1998.00369.x · DOI
- 10.1159%2F000007687 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Current Advances in Chitosan Nanoparticles Based Oral Drug Delivery for Colorectal Cancer Treatment
Choukaife, H., Seyam, S., Alallam, B., Doolaanea, A. A., & Alfatama, M. (2022) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s375229 · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Bratten, J., & Jones, M. P.
- Venue
- Digestive Diseases
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 252-259
- ISSN
- 0257-2753
- 1421-9875
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review