Cited by 12Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsVasculitis and related conditions

The Diagnosis of the Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Pengo, V., Ruffatti, A., Iliceto, S.·2006·Pathophysiology of Haemostasis and Thrombosis

Abstract

The concurrence of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies and thrombosis or pregnancy loss defines the 'antiphospholipid syndrome' (APS). The Sydney update of the classification criteria for definite APS diagnosis introduced numerous ameliorations to the previous preliminary consensus statement. Clinical criteria are now better defined as vascular thrombosis must be diagnosed on the basis of objective criteria. Moreover,additional risk factors for thrombosis or pregnancy loss must be taken into account before the diagnosis is made and should be described in detail in scientific reports. As far as laboratory criteria are concerned,the lack of standardization and the misinterpretation of results remain major problems often leading to overdiagnosis. A single positive test result out of the possible assays determining aPL antibodies (Lupus Anticoagulant, LAC, anticardiolipin, aCL and anti. beta2-Glycoprotein I, beta2-GPI, antibodies) is still sufficient,according to the Sydney criteria, to justify a diagnosis of APS. Nevertheless single test positivity may result in overdiagnosis or identification of low risk patients and use of all three tests seems more reasonable. Multiple positivity or (better) triple positivity in our experience allows for the identification of high risk patients for possible recurrence. In the near future, coagulation tests discriminating between a beta2-GPI and anti-prothrombin LAC may be useful in identifying high risk patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000093564

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pengo, V., Ruffatti, A., & Iliceto, S.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Venue
Pathophysiology of Haemostasis and Thrombosis
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2006
Volume
35
Issue
1-2
Pages
175-180
ISSN
  • 1424-8832 (ISSN-L)
  • 1424-8840
OpenAlex
W2004538033
Cited by
12
References
2
Citations by year
2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pathophysiology of Haemostasis and Thrombosis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
Keywords
antiphospholipid syndrome, antiphospholipid antibodies, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies, thrombosis, miscarriage, overdiagnosis, laboratory standardization, triple positivity, coagulation tests
MeSH terms
Autoantibodies, Glycoproteins, Humans, Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Antibodies, Anticardiolipin, beta 2-Glycoprotein I

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review