The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validity of Stroke Diagnoses in a National Register of Patients
Abstract
Background: Many registers containing routine medical information have been developed for research and surveillance purposes. In epidemiological research assessment of endpoints is often conducted via registers. In the present study we validated stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) diagnoses in the Danish National Register of Patients (DNRP). Methods: Subjects from a Danish cohort study, the Copenhagen City Heart Study (n = 19,698), were crosslinked with the DNRP. The following International Classification of Disease 10th revision codes were used to identify possible strokes and TIAs: I60–I69 and G45. Two independent raters reviewed all cases. Positive predictive values of stroke, TIA and stroke subtypes were estimated by dividing the confirmed cases by the total number of cases located in the DNRP. Interrater reliability was tested using ĸ statistics. Results: Of 236 possible cerebrovascular events, 1 in 6 stroke diagnoses did not meet study criteria. The majority of events in the DNRP were registered as unspecified stroke (I64), n = 105 (44%), of which two thirds were diagnosed as ischemic stroke events by the raters. Intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke had a positive predictive value from 74 to 97%, respectively. Conclusion: Our results show that the DNRP tends to overestimate the number of cerebrovascular events, while ischemic stroke is underestimated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
The Danish National Hospital Register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciences.
Andersen, T. F., Madsen, M., Jørgensen, J. O. L., Mellemkjoer, L., & Olsen, J. H. (1999) · PubMed · Cited by 2,026
Feigin, V. L., Lawes, C. M., Bennett, D. A., & Anderson, C. S. (2003) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00266-7 · Cited by 1,932
WHO MONICA Project Principal Invest (1988) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(88)90084-4 · Cited by 1,794
Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa.
Fleiss, J. L., Cohen, J., & Everitt, B. S. (1969) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0028106 · Cited by 1,520
Kornitzer, M., Berghmans, L., Wilmet, M. D., Darquennes, H., Lagasse, R., & Payen, R. (1988) · Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) · Cited by 1,270
Kappa coefficients in medical research
Chmura Kraemer, H., Periyakoil, V. S., & Noda, A. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1180 · Cited by 527
A framework for evaluation of secondary data sources for epidemiological research
SØRENSEN, H. T., SABROE, S., & OLSEN, J. (1996) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/25.2.435 · Cited by 455
A Classification and Outline of Cerebrovascular Diseases II
(1975) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.6.5.564 · Cited by 375
Cited by
The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential
Schmidt, M., Schmidt, S. A. J., Sandegaard, J. L., Ehrenstein, V., Pedersen, L., & Sørensen, H. T. (2015) · Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.2147/clep.s91125 · Cited by 4,769
Olesen, J. B., Lip, G. Y. H., Hansen, M. L., Hansen, P. R., Tolstrup, J. S., Lindhardsen, J., Selmer, C., Ahlehoff, O., Olsen, A.-M. S., Gislason, G. H., et al. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d124 · Cited by 1,428
Stroke and bleeding in atrial fibrillation with chronic kidney disease
Olesen, J. B., Lip, G. Y. H., Kamper, A.-L., Hommel, K., Køber, L., Lane, D. A., Lindhardsen, J., Gislason, G. H., & Torp-Pedersen, C. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1105594 · Cited by 930
Schramm, T. K., Gislason, G. H., Køber, L., Rasmussen, S., Rasmussen, J. N., Abildstrøm, S. Z., Hansen, M. L., Folke, F., Buch, P., Madsen, M., et al. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.720847 · Cited by 538
Olesen, J., Torp-Pedersen, C., Hansen, M., & Lip, G. (2012) · Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1160/th12-03-0175 · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Authors
- Krarup, L.-H., Boysen, G., Janjua, H., Prescott, E., & Truelsen, T.
- Venue
- Neuroepidemiology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 150-154
- ISSN
- 0251-5350 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0208
- OpenAlex
- W2028298306
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validity of Stroke Diagnoses in a National Register of Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000102143
- The paper
- Krarup, L.-H., Boysen, G., Janjua, H., Prescott, E., & Truelsen, T. (2007). Validity of Stroke Diagnoses in a National Register of Patients. Neuroepidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000102143
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.