Cited by 455Medical Coding and Health InformationStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyElectronic Health Records Systems

A framework for evaluation of secondary data sources for epidemiological research

SØRENSEN, HENRIK TOFT, SABROE, SVEND, OLSEN, JØRN·1996·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As part of the development in information technology, increasing amounts of health care data are available for epidemiological research. METHODS: In this review, we discuss the following factors affecting the value of secondary data in research: 1) completeness of registration of individuals, 2) the accuracy and degree of completeness of the registered data, 3) the size of the data source, 4) the registration period, 5) data accessibility, availability and cost, 6) data format, and 7) possibilities of linkage with other data sources (record linkage). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The importance of these issues depends on the use of the data and on the problems they have to address. If the evaluation is satisfactory with respect to the above-mentioned factors relevant to the particular study, the data source could be a very cost-effective way of solving the research problem.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/25.2.435

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SØRENSEN, H. T., SABROE, S., & OLSEN, J.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
SØRENSEN, HENRIK TOFT
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1996
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
435-442
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2153097236
Cited by
455
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 33
FWCI
14.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
secondary data sources, health data, data source evaluation, data quality, completeness, accuracy, data linkage, data accessibility, data formats, cost-effectiveness, epidemiological studies
MeSH terms
Confidentiality, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Epidemiologic Methods, Humans, Medical Record Linkage, Registries, Research, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Bias, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review