Factors Influencing the Evolution of Acoustic Communication: Biological Constraints
Abstract
Numerous studies have investigated selective forces that appear to influence the evolution of acoustic communication systems. I review a number of constraints on evolution in these systems. A species'' history is of undeniable importance in the analysis of any trait. However, studies have given little or no attention to phylogenetic patterns of acoustic signals. This precludes the identification of phylogenetic constraints, and should be viewed as a serious constraint on our ability to understand how communication systems evolve. Morphological constraints influence the energetic efficiency of acoustic communication. To maximize transmission distance of signals used in long-range communication, the animal''s morphology favors signals with high frequencies. Thus morphology acts in opposition to properties of the environment, which favor low frequencies for use in long-range communication. Sensory receptors also play an important role in the evolution of acoustic signals. There is significant variation in the frequency range to which an inner-ear organ of the frog is sensitive. Different lineages of frogs are characterized by ear organs with different ranges of sensitivity. This variation should influence the frequency range over which calls evolved and, as a consequence, might have influenced the rate at which different lineages of anurans speciate.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The design of acoustic communication reflects energetic costs, body-size constraints, and sensory limitations, and sexual selection can drive signal divergence and speciation.
“Its design reflects energetic costs, body-size constraints, and sensory limitations, and sexual selection can even drive signal divergence and speciation”
From Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation (2026) · cites this paper as Ryan 1986
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The energetic basis of acoustic communication
Gillooly, J. F., & Ophir, A. G. (2010) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.2134 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation
Zsebők, S. (2026) · Biologia Futura · doi:10.1007/s42977-026-00322-5
“Its design reflects energetic costs, body-size constraints, and sensory limitations, and sexual selection can even drive signal divergence and speciation (Gillooly and Ophir 2010; Ryan 1986 ; Stein and Rachlow 2023; Wilkins et al. 2013).”
- Authors
- Ryan, M. J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ryan, Michael J.
- ORCID
- Ryan, Michael J.
- Venue
- Brain, Behavior and Evolution
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2008-02-20
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 70-82
- ISSN
- 0006-8977 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9743
- OpenAlex
- W2078494276
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Behavior and Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Keywords
- acoustic communication, evolution of communication, phylogenetic constraints, morphological constraints, long-distance communication, signal frequency, sensory receptors
- MeSH terms
- Acoustics, Animals, Animal Communication, Anura, Biological Evolution, Phylogeny, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Sound, Species Specificity, Vocalization, Animal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review