The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anxiolytic Metabolites of Progesterone: Correlation with Mood and Performance Measures following Oral Progesterone Administration to Healthy Female Volunteers
Abstract
Progesterone is readily reduced in humans to its A-ring metabolites, allopregnanolone (3 alpha-hydroxy-5 alpha-pregnan-20-one) and pregnanolone (3 alpha-hydroxy-5 beta-pregnan-20-one). The latter have been reported to have anxiolytic, hypnotic and anesthetic actions when administered to laboratory animals and (or) humans. Consequently, we measured allopregnanolone and pregnanolone in 18 healthy females, ages 18-25, at the time of peak plasma progesterone following an oral dose of micronized progesterone (1,200 mg) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The plasma levels of the parent steroid and metabolites were compared with changes in mood, cognition, and motor performance following progesterone administration. We observed good correlations between plasma progesterone and plasma allopregnanolone (r = 0.85), plasma pregnanolone (r = 0.81) and the combined metabolites (r = 0.92). Plasma allopregnanolone was significantly correlated with measures of fatigue, confusion and immediate recall, and these correlation coefficients were somewhat greater than those for plasma progesterone and these same behavioral measures. Significant changes in fatigue, delayed verbal recall and symbol copying were experienced by subjects who achieved high levels (> or = 95.55 nmol/l) of these anxiolytic metabolites, while those with lower metabolite levels reported no negative effects. These data suggest that allopregnanolone and pregnanolone may contribute to or mediate the observed behavioral effects of progesterone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The GABAergic deficit hypothesis of major depressive disorder
Luscher, B., Shen, Q., & Sahir, N. (2011) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2010.120 · Cited by 934
Patchev, V. K., Shoaib, M., Holsboer, F., & Almeida, O. F. X. (1994) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(94)90330-1 · Cited by 306
Emerging diversities in the mechanism of action of steroid hormones
Brann, D. W., Hendry, L. B., & Mahesh, V. B. (1995) · The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0960-0760(94)00160-n · Cited by 260
Differential subjective effects of D-amphetamine by gender, hormone levels and menstrual cycle phase
White, T. L., Justice, A. J. H., & de Wit, H. (2002) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00818-3 · Cited by 248
Russell, J. A., Douglas, A. J., & Ingram, C. D. (2001) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(01)33002-9 · Cited by 187
Metadata
- Authors
- Freeman, E. W., Purdy, R. H., Coutifaris, C., Rickels, K., & Paul, S. M.
- Venue
- Neuroendocrinology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 478-484
- ISSN
- 0028-3835 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0194
- OpenAlex
- W1996652788
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anxiolytic Metabolites of Progesterone: Correlation with Mood and Performance Measures following Oral Progesterone Administration to Healthy Female Volunteers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000126579
- The paper
- Freeman, E. W., Purdy, R. H., Coutifaris, C., Rickels, K., & Paul, S. M. (1993). Anxiolytic Metabolites of Progesterone: Correlation with Mood and Performance Measures following Oral Progesterone Administration to Healthy Female Volunteers. Neuroendocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000126579
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.