Cited by 176Physical Activity and HealthBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionNutrition and Health in Aging

Training and detraining effects on functional fitness after a multicomponent training in older women

Carvalho, M.J., Marques, E., Mota, J.·2009·Gerontology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have been carried out in order to evaluate the potential influence of increased physical activity on the health, biological ageing and functional ability of the elderly. However, only limited information is available on the effects of multicomponent training and detraining on functional performance. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of 8-month multicomponent training and 3-month detraining on the functional fitness of older women. METHODS: Fifty-seven women were randomly assigned to an exercise (n = 32; 68.4 +/- 2.93 years) or a control group (n = 25; 69.6 +/- 4.20 years). The training program consisted of 2 sessions per week of aerobic, strength, balance and flexibility exercises. The functional fitness test battery was performed to assess the physical parameters associated with independent functioning in older adults. RESULTS: No significant changes were observed in body mass index and cardiovascular endurance as a result of the exercise training. Training induced significant (p < 0.05) improvements in chair stand (27.3%), arm curl (17.4%), chair sit-and-reach (17.4%), up-and-go (11%) and back scratch (14.5%) tests. However, both upper and lower body strength and upper and lower flexibility declined significantly after detraining in the exercise group. CONCLUSION: The results of this study highlight the negative effects of interrupting exercise on several physical parameters of functional fitness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000140681

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carvalho, M. J., Marques, E., & Mota, J.
Affiliations
Universidade do Porto (PT)
Venue
Gerontology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2008-06-19
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
41-48
ISSN
  • 0304-324X (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0003
OpenAlex
W1987337570
Cited by
176
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
functional fitness, multicomponent training, detraining, older women, exercise training, strength, flexibility, balance, aerobic exercise, physical function, aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Physical Fitness, Exercise, Range of Motion, Articular, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review