Cited by 104Bone health and osteoporosis researchStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryBone Metabolism and Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Osteoporosis after Stroke: A Review of the Causes and Potential Treatments

Open access

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a known consequence of stroke, associated with an increased incidence of fractures, mainly of the hip, leading to further disability. The pattern of bone loss seen in stroke patients is different from that usually encountered with postmenopausal osteoporosis, since it is limited to the paretic side and more evident in the upper extremities. Several factors appear to have an influence on bone mass in stroke patients, such as the degree of paresis, gait disability and the duration of immobilization. The pathogenesis of osteoporosis after stroke remains unclear. Paresis, reduced mobility and reduced bone load seem to play a major role. Other factors such as nutritional and iatrogenic ones may also play an important part. In this paper, the clinical evidence, pathophysiology and possible treatments of poststroke osteoporosis will be reviewed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000226578This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

16 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Carda, S., Cisari, C., Invernizzi, M., & Bevilacqua, M.
Affiliations
  • Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Venue
Cerebrovascular Diseases
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2009
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
191-200
ISSN
  • 1015-9770 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9786
OpenAlex
W2085742735
Cited by
104
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebrovascular Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
Keywords
stroke, bone loss, hip fracture, paresis, immobilization, gait disability, bone mass, pathogenesis, osteoporosis treatment, dietary factors, iatrogenic factors
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Osteoporosis, Risk Factors, Bone Density, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review