Cited by 49Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesReproductive Physiology in LivestockNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Seasonal and cyclical change in the luteinizing hormone response to kisspeptin in the ewe

Smith, Jeremy T., Saleh, Sofie N.H., Clarke, Iain J.·2009·Neuroendocrinology

Abstract

Background: Kisspeptins are recognized as important stimulators of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and gonadotropin secretion. In sheep, the nonbreeding (anestrous) period is characterized by reduced Kiss1 mRNA expression in the hypothalamus. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the response to kisspeptin treatment varies between the breeding and nonbreeding seasons. Methods: Corriedale ewes were treated intravenously with murine kisspeptin-10 (submaximal dose: 20 μg or maximal dose: 250 μg) or GnRH (250 ng) during either the anestrous period or during the breeding season at the luteal, mid-follicular, or late-follicular phase of the estrous cycle. Results: Kisspeptin treatment increased the concentration of luteinizing hormone (LH) in all animals. We found the LH response to kisspeptin (20 μg) was greater in ewes during the anestrous period, being 4-fold that seen during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle. Within the breeding season, kisspeptin (20 μg) was most effective during the late-follicular phase of the estrous cycle. Kisspeptin treatment (both 20 and 250 μg) had no effect on plasma levels of growth hormone, prolactin or cortisol. The variable effect of kisspeptin (20 μg) on LH secretion appeared to mirror that of GnRH treatment indicating that the effect may be mediated by a change in the pituitary response to GnRH. Conclusion: We conclude that the gonadotropic response to kisspeptin depends upon the reproductive status of the female.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000227806

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kisspeptin has been reported not to affect circulating levels of PRL in adult rats, ewes, rhesus monkeys, or healthy women.

    “Kisspeptin has been reported not to affect circulating levels of PRL in adult rats (38), ewes (39), rhesus monkeys (40), or healthy women (41).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, J. T., Saleh, S. N. H., & Clarke, I. J.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Venue
Neuroendocrinology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2009
Volume
90
Issue
3
Pages
283-291
ISSN
  • 0028-3835 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0194
OpenAlex
W2093706999
Cited by
49
References
4
Citations by year
2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
kisspeptin, luteinizing hormone, kisspeptin-10, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, anestrus, estrous cycle, seasonal reproduction, ewes, Corriedale sheep, reproductive status, follicular phase, luteal phase
MeSH terms
Anestrus, Animals, Female, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Hydrocortisone, Luteinizing Hormone, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone, Oligopeptides, Periodicity, Prolactin, Radioimmunoassay, Seasons, Sheep, Growth Hormone, Estrous Cycle, Mice, Kisspeptins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review