Cited by 94Dysphagia Assessment and ManagementNutrition and Health in AgingVoice and Speech Disorders

An Epidemiologic Study on Aging and Dysphagia in the Acute Care Hospitalized Population: 2000–2007

Leder, Steven B., Suiter, Debra M.·2009·Gerontology

Abstract

Objectives To describe total and yearly demographic trends relative to aging, dysphagia referral rates and oral feeding status in hospitalized patients from 2000 through 2007. Methods We evaluated a prospective, consecutive, referred sample of 4,038 hospitalized patients in an urban, tertiary, acute care teaching hospital. Dysphagia referral rates are described according to year, age (decade), sex, admitting diagnostic category, results of dysphagia evaluations and oral feeding status. Diagnosis of dysphagia and feeding status were assessed objectively with fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Results Dysphagia referral rates doubled between 2000 and 2007, with increases of 20% per year and increases in all decades from 2002 through 2007. Over 70% of dysphagia referrals were for older patients of 60 years and above, and over 42% of these were old old patients over 80 years. Referrals for 80 to 89-year-old patients almost doubled and for patients over 90 years more than tripled between 2000 and 2007. Of older patients over 60 years, 62.3% (1,771/2,843) did not exhibit dysphagia, 18.0% (513/2,843) benefited from specific diet modifications to reduce aspiration risk and 19.7% (559/2,843) were made nil-by-mouth due to severe dysphagia and aspiration. Conclusions From 2000 to 2007, dysphagia referrals across all ages increased by 20% each year, with more referrals for older (70.4%) than younger patients (29.6%). Referrals almost doubled for 80 to 89-year-old patients an…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000235824

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Texture-modified food might look unappealing.

    “texture-modified food might look”

    From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [182]

  • Pureed diets usually have a low energy density, indicating that a greater quantity of food needs to be consumed to meet nutrient needs, which may impose a physiological burden on older adults.

    “pureed diets usually have a low energy density, indicating that a greater”

    From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [182]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leder, S. B., & Suiter, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Memphis (US)
Venue
Gerontology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2009
Volume
55
Issue
6
Pages
714-718
ISSN
  • 0304-324X (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0003
OpenAlex
W2014473883
Cited by
94
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
dysphagia, aging, hospitalized patients, aspiration, older adults, nil per os, dietary change, fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing, demographic trends
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Deglutition, Deglutition Disorders, Diagnosis-Related Groups, Eating, Female, Hospitalization, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Male, Referral and Consultation, Risk Factors, Incidence, Endoscopy, Digestive System, Age Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review