The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of the Initial Streptococcal Microflora on Dental Enamel in Caries-Active and in Caries-Inactive Individuals
Abstract
This study compared the initial (4 h) microflora on enamel in 7 caries-active and in 7 caries-inactive adolescents. In both groups the microflora was dominated by streptococci which comprised 61 and 78% (median values) of the total viable counts in caries-active and caries-inactive individuals, respectively (p less than 0.01). Identification of a total of 700 streptococcal isolates according to a recently revised classification showed that the predominant streptococci belonged to the species Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus mitis biovar 1, and Streptococcus sanguis. Early plaque from caries-inactive individuals differed from that of caries-active individuals by significantly higher proportions of S. sanguis (p less than 0.05) and IgA1 protease producing streptococci (p less than 0.05). In caries-active individuals, there was a tendency to elevated levels of S. mitis biovar 1 (p less than 0.10). In addition, caries-active individuals were colonized by significantly higher numbers of mutans streptococci on the enamel surfaces (p less than 0.01). However, in both groups Streptococcus mutans (serotype c) comprised less than or equal to 2% of the early streptococcal flora. Streptococcus gordonii, S. mitis biovar 2, and Streptococcus salivarius were present in low proportions and did not show differences in distribution that could be related to caries activity. The observed differences in the composition of the early streptococcal microflora may be a factor that governs the eventual cariogenic potential of dental plaque.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell–cell distance
Kolenbrander, P. E., Palmer, R. J., Periasamy, S., & Jakubovics, N. S. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2381 · Cited by 1,309
Communication among Oral Bacteria
Kolenbrander, P. E., Andersen, R. N., Blehert, D. S., Egland, P. G., Foster, J. S., & Palmer, R. J. (2002) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.66.3.486-505.2002 · Cited by 1,022
Changing paradigms in concepts on dental caries: consequences for oral health care
Fejerskov, O. (2004) · Caries Research · doi:10.1159/000077753 · Cited by 804
Bacterial interactions and successions during plaque development
Kolenbrander, P. E., Palmer, R. J., Rickard, A. H., Jakubovics, N. S., Chalmers, N. I., & Diaz, P. I. (2006) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0757.2006.00187.x · Cited by 791
Bacterial coaggregation: an integral process in the development of multi-species biofilms
Rickard, A. H., Gilbert, P., High, N. J., Kolenbrander, P. E., & Handley, P. S. (2003) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0966-842x(02)00034-3 · Cited by 765
Metadata
- Authors
- Nyvad, B., & Kilian, M.
- Venue
- Caries Research
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 267-272
- ISSN
- 0008-6568 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-976X
- OpenAlex
- W1973192271
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of the Initial Streptococcal Microflora on Dental Enamel in Caries-Active and in Caries-Inactive Individuals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000261281
- The paper
- Nyvad, B., & Kilian, M. (1990). Comparison of the Initial Streptococcal Microflora on Dental Enamel in Caries-Active and in Caries-Inactive Individuals. Caries Research. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261281
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.