The Relationship between Excessive Internet Use and Depression: A Questionnaire-Based Study of 1,319 Young People and Adults
Abstract
Background There is a growing awareness of a psychiatric construct that needs to be better defined and understood: Internet addiction (IA). Recently there has been much public concern over the relationship between Internet use and negative affect. This study explored the concept of IA and examined the relationship between addictive symptoms and depression. Sampling and methods An online questionnaire was used to measure participants' Internet use, the functions for which they used the Internet, and their depressive tendencies. Three scales were included: the IA Test, the Internet Function Questionnaire and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). 1,319 respondents completed the questionnaires, with 18 (1.2%) identified as falling in the IA category. Results Correlational analyses were conducted across the whole data sample. In factorial analyses, the 18 IA respondents were compared to a matched group of non-addicted (NA) respondents in terms of their scores on the Function Test and the BDI. Across the whole data sample, there was a close relationship between IA tendencies and depression, such that IA respondents were more depressed; there were also significant differences between the sexes, with men showing more addictive tendencies than women. In addition, young people were significantly more likely to show addictive symptoms than were older people. There was a significant difference between the IA and the NA group in their levels of depressive symptoms, with the NA group firmly…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Youth who report psychological distress around online activities and describe their technology use as distressing or problematic are also more likely to report psychological distress offline.
“youth who report psychological distress around their online activities and describe their technology use as including distressing or problematic elements, are also more likely to report psychological distress in their offline lives”
From Annual Research Review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age: facts, fears, and future directions. (2020) · cites this paper as Morrison & Gore, 2010
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 14 · Cited by 437
- Authors
- Morrison, C. M., & Gore, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Venue
- Psychopathology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 121-126
- ISSN
- 0254-4962 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-033X
- OpenAlex
- W2074577226
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 73.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
- Keywords
- internet addiction, excessive internet use, depression, depressive symptoms, sex differences, age differences, online games, online communities, social isolation, comorbidities
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Social Behavior, Social Isolation, Utilization Review, Comorbidity, Behavior, Addictive, Internet, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review