The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Incidence of Spinal Cord Injury Worldwide: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: Incidence studies of spinal cord injury (SCI) are important for health-care planning and epidemiological research. This review gives a quantitative update on SCI epidemiology worldwide through a statistical evaluation of incidence rates. Methods: A systematic review was conducted. For each study, the crude rate ratio was calculated and, when possible, age- and gender-adjusted incidence rate ratios with 95% CI were determined by direct adjustment or using Poisson regression. Results: Thirteen studies were included. Annual crude incidence rates in traumatic SCI varied from 12.1 per million in The Netherlands to 57.8 per million in Portugal. Compared to the Portuguese reference study, incidence rates showed a 3-fold variation, with the highest rates in Canada and Portugal. Most traumatic SCI studies showed a bimodal age distribution. The first peak was found in young adults between 15 and 29 years and a second peak in older adults (mostly ≧65 years). Motor vehicle accidents and falls were the most prevalent causes of injury accounting for nearly equal percentages. In contrast, another age pattern in non-traumatic SCI reflected steadily increasing incidence with advancing age. Conclusions: The results show significant variation in SCI incidence with changing epidemiological patterns. A trend towards increased incidence in the elderly was observed, likely due to falls and non-traumatic injury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ahuja, C. S., Wilson, J. R., Nori, S., Kotter, M. R. N., Druschel, C., Curt, A., & Fehlings, M. G. (2017) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.18 · Cited by 2,441
Brain–computer interfaces for communication and rehabilitation
Chaudhary, U., Birbaumer, N., & Ramos-Murguialday, A. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.113 · Cited by 928
Safdarian, M., Trinka, E., Rahimi-Movaghar, V., Thomschewski, A., Aali, A., Abady, G. G., Abate, S. M., Abd-Allah, F., Abedi, A., Adane, D. E., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(23)00287-9 · Cited by 399
Epidemiology of worldwide spinal cord injury: a literature review
Kang, Y., Ding, H., Zhou, H., Wei, Z., Liu, L., Pan, D., & Feng, S. (2017) · Journal of Neurorestoratology · doi:10.2147/jn.s143236 · Cited by 315
Global Incidence and Prevalence of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
Furlan, J. C., Sakakibara, B. M., Miller, W. C., & Krassioukov, A. V. (2013) · Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · doi:10.1017/s0317167100014530 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- van den Berg, M. E. L., Castellote, J. M., Mahillo-Fernandez, I., & de Pedro-Cuesta, J.
- Venue
- Neuroepidemiology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 184-192
- ISSN
- 0251-5350 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0208
- OpenAlex
- W2034199603
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence of Spinal Cord Injury Worldwide: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000279335
- The paper
- van den Berg, M. E. L., Castellote, J. M., Mahillo-Fernandez, I., & de Pedro-Cuesta, J. (2010). Incidence of Spinal Cord Injury Worldwide: A Systematic Review. Neuroepidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000279335
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.