Cited by 14Allergic Rhinitis and SensitizationFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseases

Distribution of Core Fragments from the Major Cat Allergen Fel d 1 Is Maintained among the Main Anatomical Sites of Production

Bienboire-Frosini, Cécile, Lebrun, Régine, Vervloet, Daniel, Pageat, Patrick, Ronin, Catherine·2010·International Archives of Allergy and Immunology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Polymorphism of Fel d 1 has long been observed, but structural characterization of Fel d 1 variants among the various sites of production and animals is still missing. This study was aimed at elucidating the structural polymorphism of this protein as a function of the site of production and the resulting influence on the immunological behavior of the allergen. METHODS: Fel d 1 was water-extracted from the 4 main sites of production, i.e. cheek zone, interdigital zone, anal sac (AS), and chest area and a panel of 10 cats. Fel d 1-like materials were immunoblotted, immunopurified and characterized by MALDI-TOF MS. Immunoreactivity was studied using ELISA dose-dependent curves at equilibrium. RESULTS: In all areas, 4-10 isoforms ranging from 7 to 40 kDa were detected by MS. Essentially two truncated heterodimers of 13-14 and 16-17 kDa were identified together with intact Fel d 1 in all compartments and they were largely predominant in AS. These core fragments were found to contribute to a variable recognition by antibodies in a panel of ELISA. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified truncated dimers of Fel d 1, probably resulting from proteolytic degradation of both chains and present in all cats. Core fragments are largely distributed among anatomical sites of production and especially well represented in AS. They are recognized as intact allergens by antibodies and may therefore introduce discrepancies in allergen measurement depending on the variable amount of intact and degraded Fel d 1 produced by the cat.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000283024

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bienboire-Frosini, C., Lebrun, R., Vervloet, D., Pageat, P., & Ronin, C.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Hôpital Sainte-Marguerite (FR)
Venue
International Archives of Allergy and Immunology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2010
Volume
152
Issue
3
Pages
197-206
ISSN
  • 1018-2438 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0097
OpenAlex
W2079587783
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Archives of Allergy and Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
Fel d 1, cat allergen, structural polymorphism, proteolysis, anal sacs, antibody recognition, feline allergy
MeSH terms
Allergens, Animals, Animal Structures, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antigen-Antibody Reactions, Cats, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Glycoproteins, Molecular Weight, Oxidation-Reduction, Peptide Fragments, Blotting, Western, Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review