Cited by 7Animal Nutrition and PhysiologyFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchVeterinary Medicine and Surgery

Evaluation of anti-Fel d 1 IgY ingredient for pet food on growth performance in kittens

Open access
Hedrick, Erik D., Matulka, Ray A., Conboy-Schmidt, Lisa, May, Kimberly A.·2024·Frontiers in Veterinary Science

Abstract

Introduction: The domestic cat (Felis catus) is one of the most common pets. Worldwide, approximately one in five adults are sensitive to cat allergens. The major cat allergen is the secretoglobulin Fel d 1, which is primarily produced in the salivary and sebaceous glands. Chickens produce IgY antibodies, which are similar in structure to mammalian IgG. When chickens are exposed to Fel d 1, anti-Fel d 1-specific IgY (AFD1) is produced and is naturally concentrated in egg yolk. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tolerability, effects on growth and food consumption, and potential adverse effects of a chicken egg product ingredient containing AFD1 in kittens. Methods: This was a blinded, controlled study. Twenty-seven (27) eight-week old kittens were randomly assigned to three feeding groups containing 0 ppm AFD1 (Group 0), 8 ppm AFD1 (Group 1), and 16 ppm AFD1 (Group 2) for 84 days. Veterinary exams and bloodwork were performed on Day 42 and Day 84, and body weight and body condition score (BCS) were monitored weekly. Results: Throughout the study, there were no signs of nutritional deficiency or adverse clinical events in any of the subjects. Administration of a chicken egg product ingredient containing AFD1 in the diet (whether in coating or combination of coating and top dress) had no significant effect on body weight nor food consumption, and all subjects maintained a healthy Body Condition Score (BCS) throughout the study. Moreover, there were no biologically significant differences in the mean clinical chemistry and hematology parameters. Discussion: This study demonstrated that a diet formulated to contain up to 16 ppm AFD1, included in the coating and the top-dress of dry kitten food, was well tolerated, promoted adequate growth, and exhibited no adverse effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fvets.2024.1355390

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Long-term high-dose supplementation over 26 weeks resulted in no adverse changes in body weight, blood biochemical parameters, or toxicological indicators.

    “Long-term high-dose supplementation over 26 weeks resulted in no adverse changes in body weight, blood biochemical parameters, or toxicological indicators [129].”

    From Advance in Managing Indoor Cat Allergen Proteins: Molecular Insights, Detection, and Control (2025) · cites this paper as [129]

    The Results (Growth and food consumption) report no significant difference in body weight or weight gain among diet groups, and the Discussion reports no clinical or pathological signs of harm based in part on clinical chemistry and health observations. However, Materials and methods (Allocation/randomization and diet trial) says the kittens received their assigned diets through Day 84, not for 26 weeks. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [44]United States Food and Drug Administration. Representatives OotLCotUSHo. United States code, title 21 - food and drugs, chapter 9 - Federal Food, drug and cosmetic act. (2019).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hedrick, E. D., Matulka, R. A., Conboy-Schmidt, L., & May, K. A.
Affiliations
Nestlé (Switzerland) (CH)
Corresponding author
May, Kimberly A.
Venue
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Published
2024-03-05
Volume
11
Pages
1355390-1355390
ISSN
2297-1769 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392468630
Cited by
7
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Veterinary Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
Keywords
Fel d 1, cat allergen, chicken egg yolk, pet food, body condition score, clinical chemistry, hematology, feline allergy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review