Cited by 74Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Perception of Heart Rate and Blood Pressure: The Role of Alexithymia and Anxiety

Open access
Näring, G.W.B., van der Staak, C.P.F.·2010·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Abstract

While the ability to estimate heart rate in a laboratory setting appears to be related to anxiety and alexithymia, it is still unclear how the ability to estimate blood pressure is related to these psychological measures. The perception of heart rate and blood pressure in 24 normotensive subjects with varying degrees of alexithymia and anxiety was examined. Results indicate that the estimation of heart rate is related to psychological characteristics, while the estimation of blood pressure is not. More anxious subjects perceived heart rate more accurately than less anxious subjects. Furthermore, high alexithymic subjects perceived heart rate less accurately than low alexithymic subjects. The accuracy of estimation of blood pressure was, however, not related to alexithymia or anxiety. These findings provide further evidence that blood pressure estimates in a laboratory setting are mainly based upon situational cues.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000288959

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased alexithymia is associated with decreased interoceptive accuracy, specifically less accurate heartbeat detection.

    “Some evidence suggests that increased alexithymia was associated with decreased interoceptive accuracy; specifically that those with higher levels of alexithymia were less accurate at detecting their heartbeat (Herbert et al., 2011; Murphy, Brewer, et al., 2018; Näring and van der Staak, 1995; Shah, Hall, Catmur, and Bird, 2016).”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Näring and van der Staak, 1995

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Näring, G. W. B., & van der Staak, C. P. F.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2010-02-18
Volume
63
Issue
3-4
Pages
193-200
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
OpenAlex
W2032817114
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 27 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
heartbeat perception, alexithymia, anxiety, heart rate estimation, blood pressure estimation, situational cues, normotensive subjects
MeSH terms
Adult, Affective Symptoms, Anxiety, Awareness, Blood Pressure, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Social Environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review