The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 2 are not checked yet.
Rosiglitazone Monotherapy in Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease: Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study
Open accessAbstract
Background/Aims: A phase II study of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist rosiglitazone extended release (RSG XR) in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease (AD) detected a treatment benefit to cognition in apolipoprotein E(APOE)-Ε4-negative subjects. The current phase III study with prospective stratification by APOE genotype was conducted to confirm the efficacy and safety of RSG XR in mild-to-moderate AD. An open-label extension study assessed the long-term safety and tolerability of 8 mg RSG XR. Methods: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study enrolled 693 subjects. Within 2 APOE allelic strata (Ε4-positive, Ε4-negative), subjects were randomized (2:2:2:1) to once-daily placebo, 2 mg RSG XR, 8 mg RSG XR or 10 mg donepezil (control). Coprimary endpoints were change from baseline to week 24 in the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) score, and week 24 Clinician’s Interview-Based Impression of Change plus caregiver input (CIBIC+). Results: At week 24, no significant differences from placebo in change from baseline in coprimary endpoints were detected with either the RSG XR dose in APOE-Ε4-negative subjects or overall. For donepezil, no significant treatment difference was detected in ADAS-Cog; however, a significant difference was detected (p = 0.009) on the CIBIC+. Peripheral edema was the most common adverse event for 8 mg RSG XR (15%) and placebo (5%), and nasopharyngitis for 2 mg RSG XR (7%). Conclusion: No evidence of efficacy of 2 mg or 8 mg RSG XR monotherapy in cognition or global function was detected in the APOE-Ε4-negative or other analysis populations. The safety and tolerability of RSG XR was consistent with its known pharmacology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, phase III clinical trials, using rosiglitazone, failed to show efficacy for the treatment of AD (Gold et al., 2010).”
From Mechanisms Underlying the Rapid Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ-Mediated Amyloid Clearance and Reversal of Cognitive Deficits in a Murine Model of Alzheimer's Disease (2012) · cites this paper as Gold et al., 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D., & Stadlan, E. M. (1984) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.34.7.939 · Cited by 27,915
EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life
(1990) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 · Cited by 15,736
The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: Comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia
Cummings, J. L., Mega, M., Gray, K., Rosenberg-Thompson, S., Carusi, D. A., & Gornbein, J. (1994) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.44.12.2308 · Cited by 7,568
Román, G. C., Tatemichi, T. K., Erkinjuntti, T., Cummings, J. L., Masdeu, J. C., Garcia, J. H., Amaducci, L., Orgogozo, J.-M., Brun, A., Hofman, A., et al. (1993) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.43.2.250 · Cited by 4,921
A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease
(1984) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.141.11.1356 · Cited by 4,175
A 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer's disease
Rogers, S. L., Farlow, M. R., Doody, R. S., Mohs, R., Friedhoff, L. T., & Donepezil Study Group* (1998) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.50.1.136 · Cited by 1,618
Cummings, J. L. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra040223 · Cited by 1,152
Gélinas, I., Gauthier, L., McIntyre, M., & Gauthier, S. (1999) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.53.5.471 · Cited by 918
Raskind (2000) · doi:10.1212/wnl.54.12.2261 · Cited by 870
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease
Heneka, M. T., Carson, M. J., Khoury, J. E., Landreth, G. E., Brosseron, F., Feinstein, D. L., Jacobs, A. H., Wyss-Coray, T., Vitorica, J., Ransohoff, R. M., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(15)70016-5 · Cited by 6,226
Self-citationDementia prevention, intervention, and care
Livingston, G., Sommerlad, A., Orgeta, V., Costafreda, S. G., Huntley, J., Ames, D., Ballard, C., Banerjee, S., Burns, A., Cohen-Mansfield, J., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31363-6 · Cited by 6,072
Neuroinflammation and microglial activation in Alzheimer disease: where do we go from here?
Leng, F., & Edison, P. (2021) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-020-00435-y · Cited by 3,179
Microglial priming in neurodegenerative disease
Perry, V. H., & Holmes, C. (2014) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2014.38 · Cited by 1,127
Apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological disorders
Verghese, P. B., Castellano, J. M., & Holtzman, D. M. (2011) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70325-2 · Cited by 857
Metadata
- Authors
- Gold, M., Alderton, C., Zvartau-Hind, M., Egginton, S., Saunders, A. M., Irizarry, M., Craft, S., Landreth, G., Linnamägi, Ü., & Sawchak, S.
- Affiliations
- GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Duke University (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
- University of Tartu (EE)
- Venue
- Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 131-146
- ISSN
- 1420-8008 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9824
- PMC
- PMC3214882
- OpenAlex
- W1978999542
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 31
- FWCI
- 18.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- GlaxoSmithKline
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG030482)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonists, APOE ε4 genotype, donepezil, cognitive function, global function, peripheral edema, drug safety and tolerability, ADAS-Cog
- MeSH terms
- Rosiglitazone, Donepezil, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alleles, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Edema, Female, Genotype, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Indans, Intelligence Tests, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Nasopharyngitis, Piperidines, Treatment Outcome, Thiazolidinediones, PPAR gamma, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review