Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 17Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosisTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyLymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dot-ELISA vs. PCR of Fine Needle Aspirates of Tuberculous Lymphadenitis

Abstract

Objective To evaluate an in-house dot-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for confirmation of clinically suspected cases of tuberculous lymphadenitis (TBLN). Study design The study was performed at the postgraduate departments of microbiology and pathology of a tertiary-care teaching hospital in India. Suspected cases of TBLN were prospectively enrolled. Fine needle aspiration was done of enlarged lymph nodes in all patients, and 2 smears were prepared, 1 for acid-fast bacillus (AFB) demonstration and the other for cytologic examination. The remaining material was tested with in-house dot-ELISA and by IS6110 amplification with polymerase chain reaction (PCR), for diagnosis of TBLN. Results ELISA was more sensitive and detected 93.2% of cases. PCR and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) detected 82.5% and 61.0% cases, respectively. AFB positivity was 33.1%. Conclusion Application of dot-ELISA was more sensitive but less specific as compared to PCR. PCR, though expensive, should be used in problem cases because of its high specificity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000326089

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Jain, A., Verma, R. K., Tiwari, V., & Goel, M. M.
Affiliations
King George's Medical University (IN)
Venue
Acta Cytologica
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2005
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
17-21
ISSN
  • 0001-5547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2650
OpenAlex
W2088974006
Cited by
16
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Cytologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis
Keywords
tuberculous lymphadenitis, dot-ELISA, IS6110 PCR, fine needle aspiration cytology, acid-fast bacillus smear, sensitivity and specificity, Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Child, Preschool, Developing Countries, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Humans, India, Lymphadenitis, Middle Aged, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tuberculosis, Lymph Node, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Biopsy, Fine-Needle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.