Cited by 193Nutrition and Health in AgingBody Composition Measurement TechniquesDialysis and Renal Disease Management

The evaluation of body composition: A useful tool for clinical practice

Open access
Thibault, Ronan, Pichard, Claude·2012·Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism

Abstract

Undernutrition is insufficiently detected in in- and outpatients, and this is likely to worsen during the next decades. The increased prevalence of obesity together with chronic illnesses associated with fat-free mass (FFM) loss will result in an increased prevalence of sarcopenic obesity. In patients with sarcopenic obesity, weight loss and the body mass index lack accuracy to detect FFM loss. FFM loss is related to increasing mortality, worse clinical outcomes, and impaired quality of life. In sarcopenic obesity and chronic diseases, body composition measurement with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance analysis, or computerized tomography quantifies the loss of FFM. It allows tailored nutritional support and disease-specific therapy and reduces the risk of drug toxicity. Body composition evaluation should be integrated into routine clinical practice for the initial assessment and sequential follow-up of nutritional status. It could allow objective, systematic, and early screening of undernutrition and promote the rational and early initiation of optimal nutritional support, thereby contributing to reducing malnutrition-induced morbidity, mortality, worsening of the quality of life, and global health care costs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000334879

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thibault, R., & Pichard, C.
Affiliations
  • Unité de Nutrition Humaine (FR)
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
Venue
Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2011-12-16
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
6-16
ISSN
  • 0250-6807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9697
OpenAlex
W1994685047
Cited by
193
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Keywords
body composition, malnutrition, sarcopenic obesity, fat-free mass loss, nutritional assessment, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance analysis, nutritional support, chronic disease, malnutrition screening
MeSH terms
Body Composition, Energy Intake, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Nutritional Requirements, Nutritional Status, Obesity, Prognosis, Thinness, Bone Density, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Nutritional Support, Disease Management, Malnutrition, Overnutrition, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review