Cited by 108Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyEsophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentEnhanced Recovery After Surgery

Early enteral nutrition reduces the rate of life-threatening complications after thoracic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer

Fujita, T., Daiko, H., Nishimura, M.·2012·European Surgical Research

Abstract

Background: Early postoperative enteral nutrition has been suggested to improve the nutritional status of patients after esophageal surgery. However, whether enteral nutrition decreases rates of surgical complications and increases the completion rate of the clinical management pathway is unclear. Methods: We analyzed 154 patients who were randomly assigned to either an enteral or parenteral nutrition group after undergoing esophagectomy, compared the incidence of surgical complications, and evaluated the completion rate of the clinical pathway. In these 2 patient groups, perioperative management was performed through identical clinical pathways, except for nutrition. Results: The overall rate of surgical complications of any type did not differ between patients who received early enteral nutrition and those who did not (p = 0.50); however, the rate of life-threatening surgical complications was significantly lower in patients who received early enteral nutrition (p = 0.02). The rate of non-life-threatening surgical complications did not differ between the groups (p = 0.98). In patients who received enteral nutrition, the completion rate of the clinical pathway was higher (p = 0.03), and the postoperative hospital stay was shorter (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Early enteral nutrition reduces the incidence of life-threatening surgical complications and improves the completion rate of the clinical pathway for thoracic esophagectomy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000336574

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One larger retrospective study comparing early EN via surgical jejunostomy with early PN resulted in less life-threatening complications and a shorter postoperative hospital stay.

    “One larger retrospective study comparing early EN via surgical jejunostomy with early PN resulted in less life-threatening complications and a shorter postoperative hospital stay [116].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fujita, T., Daiko, H., & Nishimura, M.
Affiliations
National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP)
Venue
European Surgical Research
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2012
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
79-84
ISSN
  • 0014-312X (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9921
OpenAlex
W2049052172
Cited by
108
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Surgical Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Keywords
early enteral nutrition, thoracic esophagectomy, esophageal cancer, postoperative complications, life-threatening complications, parenteral nutrition, postoperative hospital stay, nutritional support
MeSH terms
Aged, Enteral Nutrition, Esophageal Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Care, Postoperative Complications, Thoracoscopy, Thoracotomy, Esophagectomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review