The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of Fluoridated Milk on Enamel and Root Dentin Demineralization Evaluated by a Biofilm Caries Model
Abstract
Although some studies suggest an anticaries effect of fluoridated bovine milk (F-milk) on enamel, evidence is still considered weak. Even more uncertain, the effect of F-milk on root caries remains largely unknown. This study evaluated the effect of F-milk on enamel and on root dentin demineralization using a validated Streptococcus mutans biofilm model, simulating a high cariogenic challenge. S. mutans (UA159) biofilms were formed on bovine enamel and root dentin saliva-coated slabs after measuring initial surface microhardness (SH). Biofilms were exposed to 10% sucrose 8×/day and treated 2×/day with either: (1) 0.9% NaCl (negative control), (2) bovine milk, (3) F-milk (5.0 ppm F as NaF) or (4) NaF 0.05% (anticaries-positive control). Medium pH was monitored twice/day, as a biofilm acidogenicity indicator. After 5 days for enamel and 4 days for dentin, biofilms were recovered to analyze: biomass, soluble proteins, viable microorganisms, and extra- and intracellular polysaccharides. Enamel and dentin demineralization were estimated by percentage of SH loss. Results were compared by ANOVA and Tukey’s test. Neither acidogenicity nor biofilm composition differed among treatment groups in biofilms formed on enamel or dentin (p > 0.05). F-milk, however, significantly reduced enamel and dentin demineralization when compared with the negative control (p < 0.05). Also, F-milk was as efficient as 0.05% NaF to reduce enamel (p > 0.05), but not dentin demineralization (p < 0.05). These findings suggest that milk containing 5.0 ppm of fluoride is effective to control enamel caries and that it may be effective on root dentin caries prevention.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This model was successfully used to evaluate the effect of iron on enamel and dietary products on either enamel or dentine demineralization.
“This model was successfully used to evaluate the effect of iron on enamel [37] and dietary products on either enamel or dentine demineralization [34–36].”
From Validation of a Cariogenic Biofilm Model to Evaluate the Effect of Fluoride on Enamel and Root Dentine Demineralization (2016) · cites this paper as [35]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- 10.1159%2F000154783 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016%2FS0003-9969%2803%2900087-6 · DOI
- 10.1177%2F146642408510500304 · DOI
- 10.1542%2Fpeds.2004-2462 · DOI
- 10.1159%2F000261581 · DOI
- 10.1159%2F000057864 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1590%2FS1806-83242010000200002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159%2F000096100 · DOI
- 10.1159%2F000016629 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159%2F000262418 · DOI
- 10.1021%2Fac60111a017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007%2Fs00784-006-0053-4 · DOI
- 10.1177%2F00220345010800101701 · DOI
- 10.1016%2Fj.jdent.2011.08.016 · DOI
- 10.1111%2Fj.1754-4505.2005.tb01421.x · DOI
- 10.1177%2F08959374950090020701 · DOI
- 10.1159%2F000016453 · DOI
- 10.1093%2Fjac%2Fdkg449 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159%2F000261597 · DOI
- 10.1007%2FBF03262681 · DOI
- 10.1111%2Fj.1752-7325.2004.tb02735.x · DOI
- 10.1016%2FS0168-6445%2802%2900143-2 · DOI
- 10.1136%2Fbmj.321.7265.855 · DOI
- 10.1177%2F08959374950090020301 · DOI
- 10.1016%2Fj.archoralbio.2010.12.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159%2F000057589 · DOI
- 10.1128%2FAEM.66.4.1720-1723.2000 · DOI
- 10.1007%2Fs00103-009-0835-3 · DOI
- 10.1159%2F000016600 · DOI
- 10.1177%2F0022034510383428 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038%2Fsj.ebd.6400578 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fernández, C. E., Tenuta, L. M. A., & Cury, J. A. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146478 · Cited by 74
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Giacaman, R. A., Muñoz, M. J., Ccahuana-Vasquez, R. A., Muñoz-Sandoval, C., & Cury, J. A.
- Venue
- Caries Research
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 460-466
- ISSN
- 0008-6568
- 1421-976X
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review