The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Starch and Sucrose on Dental Biofilm Formation and on Root Dentine Demineralization
Abstract
The cariogenicity of starch alone or in combination with sucrose is controversial and the effect on dentine demineralization and on the dental biofilm formed has not been explored under controlled conditions. A crossover, single-blind study was conducted in four steps of 14 days each, during which 11 volunteers wore palatal appliance containing 10 slabs of root dentine to which the following treatments were applied extraorally: 2% starch gel-like solution (starch group); 10% sucrose solution (sucrose group); a solution containing 2% starch and 10% sucrose (starch + sucrose group), or 2% starch solution followed by 10% sucrose solution (starch → sucrose group). On the 14th day of each phase the biofilms were collected for biochemical and microbiological analyses, and dentine demineralization was assessed by hardness. A higher demineralization was found in dentine exposed to sucrose and starch sucrose combinations than to starch alone (p < 0.01), but the sucrose-containing groups did not differ significantly from each other (p > 0.05). The concentrations of soluble and insoluble extracellular polysaccharides (EPS), and the proportion of insoluble EPS, were lower in the biofilm formed in presence of starch (p < 0.01) than in those formed in the presence of sucrose or sucrose/starch combinations; however, no significant difference was observed among the groups containing sucrose (p > 0.05). RNA was successfully isolated and purified from in situ biofilms and only biofilms formed in response to sucrose and starch/sucrose combinations showed detectable levels of gtf B and gtf C mRNA. The findings suggest that the combination of starch with sucrose may not be more cariogenic to dentine than sucrose alone.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of surface hardness as an indicator of dentine mineral loss has been widely employed because there is a high correlation with transversal microradiography, which directly quantifies demineralization in dental enamel and also in dentine.
“About the use of surface hardness as indicator of dentine mineral loss, it has been widely employed [25, 33, 34, 36, 39, 56–59] because there is a high correlation with transversal microradiography [25], which directly quantifies demineralization in dental enamel and also in dentine [60].”
From Validation of a Cariogenic Biofilm Model to Evaluate the Effect of Fluoride on Enamel and Root Dentine Demineralization (2016) · cites this paper as [58]
Citations
Cites
Are dental diseases examples of ecological catastrophes?
Marsh, P. D. (2003) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.26082-0 · Cited by 1,256
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- 10.1159%2F000059331 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177%2F154411130201300203 · DOI
- 10.1159%2F000096100 · DOI
- 10.1016%2Fj.ab.2007.03.021 · DOI
- 10.1159%2F000262418 · DOI
- 10.1159%2F000016629 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111%2Fj.1399-302X.2007.00412.x · DOI
- 10.1021%2Fac60111a017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159%2F000260692 · DOI
- 10.1016%2F0003-9969%2882%2990026-7 · DOI
- 10.1016%2Fj.mam.2005.12.003 · DOI
- 10.1177%2F154405910208100205 · DOI
- 10.1016%2F0003-9969%2873%2990109-X · DOI
- 10.1159%2F000077757 · DOI
- 10.1159%2F000072165 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177%2F10454411970080020601 · DOI
- 10.1016%2FS0003-9969%2898%2900123-X · DOI
- 10.1128%2FAAC.50.2.542-546.2006 · DOI
- 10.1093%2Fglycob%2F7.7.929 · DOI
- 10.1177%2F10454411000110030601 · DOI
- 10.1159%2F000260514 · DOI
- 10.1159%2F000261125 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159%2F000083157 · DOI
- 10.1079%2FBJN20051452 · DOI
- 10.1099%2Fjmm.0.47146-0 · DOI
- 10.1159%2F000095656 · DOI
- 10.1159%2F000091065 · DOI
- 10.1016%2F0003-9969%2895%2900129-8 · DOI
- 10.1046%2Fj.1440-1711.2001.01002.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toiviainen, A., Jalasvuori, H., Lahti, E., Gursoy, U., Salminen, S., Fontana, M., Flannagan, S., Eckert, G., Kokaras, A., Paster, B., et al. (2015) · Clinical Oral Investigations · doi:10.1007/s00784-014-1221-6 · Cited by 140
Fernández, C. E., Tenuta, L. M. A., & Cury, J. A. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146478 · Cited by 74
Self-citationCosta, R. C., Souza, J. G. S., Bertolini, M., Retamal‐Valdes, B., Feres, M., & Barão, V. A. R. (2020) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1111/clr.13663 · Cited by 48
Effect of sucrose on biofilm formed in situ on titanium material
Souza, J. G. S., Cury, J. A., Ricomini Filho, A. P., Feres, M., Faveri, M. D., & Barão, V. A. R. (2019) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1002/jper.18-0219 · Cited by 41
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Aires, C. P., Del Bel Cury, A. A., Tenuta, L. M. A., Klein, M. I., Koo, H., Duarte, S., & Cury, J. A.
- Venue
- Caries Research
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 380-386
- ISSN
- 0008-6568
- 1421-976X
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review