CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 34Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsCardiac Health and Mental HealthAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

Alexithymia is associated with delayed treatment seeking in acute myocardial infarction

Carta, M.G., Sancassiani, F., Pippia, V., Bhat, Krishna M., Sardu, C., Meloni, L.·2013·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
DOI 10.1159/000341181
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The elapsed time between a person experiencing pain or discomfort due to an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with ST segment elevation (STEMI) and his/her arrival at a hospital seeking care is crucial for survival. In fact, the degree of myocardial necrosis is related to the length of the ischemic episode [1], and survival depends on the early provision of reperfusion techniques. If reperfusion occurs within 2 h, some preservation of myocardial function is achieved; after this period, life expectancy or survival decreases drastically [2]. The most important factor impacting on longer time to treatment is the patient's decision to delay seeking care [1]. Thus, psychological variables such as alexithymia influencing the decision may be relevant. Unfortunately many of the findings with respect to psychosocial factors in delayed care seeking are still controversial [3]. We sought to explore psychological factors that might explain the delay in seeking care in STEMI with particular attention to alexithymia.Consecutive patients aged 18-85 years, admitted to a Cardiology Ward at Cagliari University Hospital, from April 2010 to June 2011, diagnosed with STEMI according to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines [2] were eligible for this study. The study sample was divided based on ‘time to treatment', defined as the interval between the onset of symptoms and the first diagnostic ECG: controls = early care-seeking patients (<2 h); cases = late care-seeking patients (>2 h).A form was to be filled in to record sociodemographic data, health service utilization and risk factors [4]; the study adopted the nonpatient version of the SCID-I-DSM-IV [4] and the Italian version of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) [5], a self-reporting checklist measuring the ability to identify and describe feelings and to distinguish between feelings and bodily sensations. Alexithymic trait scores were characterized using established classification scores (scores ≥61). Statistical analyses were carried out in a 2-step logistic regression approach. All possible factors were entered simultaneously in a single block. All 2-way interactions between the possible risk factors were included. To select significant interactions, a backward elimination procedure with a threshold of p < 0.20 was used.The final sample included 83 patients, with 73.5% males. The mean time to treatment was 176.75 ± 239.65 min. In the analyses, 36 patients (43.4%) were allocated to the cases, 47 patients (56.6%) to the controls. Table 1 lists the frequencies of factors concerning the awareness of the disease and care-seeking behavior. None of the possible confounding factors taken into account differed between cases and controls in a statistically significant manner. However, the association between alexithymia (OR for cases 3.7, 95% CI 1.3-10.1) and contact with primary care prior to hospitalization (OR for cases 3.5, 95% CI 1.3-9.3) was statistically significant. No difference was found between cases and controls with regard to diagnosis of lifetime anxiety and depression. The multivariate analysis confirms the differences indicated by the univariate model but the two factors did not show any interaction, since the copresence of the two risk factors produced a cumulative risk without significant amplification (OR approx. 15.5, 95% CI 2.85-84.6; p < 0.0001).The study shows that low emotional awareness, measured by alexithymia, and having had contact with primary care were associated with increased time to treatment in STEMI. No interaction was found between the two factors. An early study of Kenyon et al. [6] found evidence that the presence of alexithymia predicted a delay in seeking treatment in AMI. A study of O'Carroll et al. [7], 10 years later, found some differences in alexithymia when comparing a group of patients with AMI who were prompt care seekers (<4 h), and a group of late AMI care seekers (>4 h) but these differences did not reach the threshold for statistical significance. Even so the results of such studies are partially in agreement with our data; the extension of their study sample might have biased the results since STEMI is the severest form of AMI and the only in which the delay in medical intervention is currently known to be of great danger [2]. On the other hand, ours is the first report in the literature exploring alexithymia as a potential risk factor for delay in seeking care in STEMI and also the first study to divide cases and controls with the delayed time known to be associated with a poor outcome (2 h) [2].Sociodemographic and clinical variables did not independently appear to explain the delay. These results partially confirm the previous findings [8]. However, there appears to be some contradictory findings concerning consultation with a primary care physician [8]. It may be that association between delayed time and contact with primary care may be related to specific patterns of care organization [8].The lack of a b

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000341181

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with alexithymia are delayed in seeking medical treatment in response to acute myocardial infarction.

    “individuals with alexithymia are delayed in seeking medical treatment in response to acute myocardial infarction, for example (Carta et al., 2013; Kenyon et al., 1991).”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Carta et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Carta, M. G., Sancassiani, F., Pippia, V., Bhat, K. M., Sardu, C., & Meloni, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Cagliari (IT)
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
ORCID
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2013
Volume
82
Issue
3
Pages
190-192
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
DOI
10.1159/000341181
OpenAlex
W1999123979
Cited by
34
References
10
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS045261)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
alexithymia, delayed treatment seeking, acute myocardial infarction, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, time to treatment, reperfusion therapy, psychosocial factors, Toronto Alexithymia Scale
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affective Symptoms, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Logistic Models, Young Adult, Time-to-Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review