Cited by 60

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Environmental and Occupational Risk Factors for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Case-Control Study

Malek, Angela M., Barchowsky, Aaron, Bowser, Robert, Heiman-Patterson, Terry, Lacomis, David, Rana, Sandeep, Youk, Ada, Stickler, David, Lackland, Daniel T., Talbott, Evelyn O.·2014·Neurodegenerative Diseases

Abstract

Background/Aims: Environmental and occupational exposures are implicated as risk factors for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), the etiology of which is largely unknown, although no causal relationships have been established. Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the associations of personal risk factors and self-reported environmental and occupational exposures with risk of ALS. Methods: The cases involved ALS patients (n = 66) identified from major neurological centers in Pittsburgh and Philadelphia, Pa., USA, from 2008 to 2010. The age-, race- and sex-matched controls included outpatient hospital and population-based controls (n = 66). A detailed questionnaire obtaining data on occupation, vocational and avocational exposure as well as personal lifestyle factors was administered. Results: Occupational exposure to metals (odds ratio, OR = 3.65; 95% CI: 1.15, 11.60) and pesticides (OR = 6.50; 95% CI: 1.78, 23.77) was related to increased risk of ALS after controlling for smoking and education. No associations were found for occupational exposure to organic or aromatic solvents. Conclusion: Workers exposed to metals and pesticides may be at greater risk of ALS. Future research should involve more accurate exposure assessment through the use of job exposure matrices, confirmation of occupation and biomarkers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000355344

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a Pennsylvania study of 66 cases and matched controls, occupational exposure to metals was associated with a 3.65-fold increased risk (95% CI 1.15-11.60).

    “In a Pennsylvania study of 66 cases and matched controls, occupational exposure to metals was associated with a 3.65‐fold increased risk (95% CI 1.15‐11.60).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1007/s00415-011-6390-5 · DOI
  2. 10.1159/000089625 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2008.10.011 · DOI
  4. 10.3109/17482961003610853 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/14660820310011250 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/14660820050515061 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1159/000126911 · DOI
  8. 10.1097/00001648-199609000-00013 · DOI
  9. 10.1097/00001648-200205000-00012 · DOI
  10. 10.1001/archneur.1996.00550080044011 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195133790.003.07 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009070 · DOI
  13. 10.1136/oem.49.11.791 · DOI
  14. 10.1136/jnnp.33.6.877 · DOI
  15. 10.1136/jnnp.56.11.1200 · DOI
  16. 10.1159/000072925 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1991.tb03970.x · DOI
  18. 10.1080/14660820600640596 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.neuro.2012.04.001 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.envres.2012.06.007 · DOI
  21. 10.1212/WNL.38.10.1604 · DOI
  22. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000048208.54755.78 · DOI
  23. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000277463.87361.8c · DOI
  24. 10.1093/aje/kwi343 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1159/000069413 · DOI
  26. 10.1212/WNL.41.7.1077 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/ajim.10148 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/0022-510X(94)90191-0 · DOI
  29. 10.1289/ehp.0900580 · DOI
  30. 10.1289/ehp.7135 · DOI
  31. 10.1159/000095552 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/ajmg.b.30543 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Malek, A. M., Barchowsky, A., Bowser, R., Heiman-Patterson, T., Lacomis, D., Rana, S., Youk, A., Stickler, D., Lackland, D. T., & Talbott, E. O.
Venue
Neurodegenerative Diseases
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2013-11-12
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
31-38
ISSN
  • 1660-2854
  • 1660-2862
Cited by
60
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review