Cited by 57

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: toxins and environment

Mitchell, JD·2000·Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Other Motor Neuron Disorders

Abstract

The role of environmental influences in the aetiopathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has exercised minds since the 19th century. Despite strong hunches that environmental agents might be implicated in the causation of ALS, research seeking more objective evidence has generally yielded results which have been confusing and difficult to understand in terms of a unitary aetiological hypothesis. This review attempts to draw this evidence together in the context of a semi-systematic review of the literature. Potential physical influences are described as well as the better known chemical factors. The interface with recent advances in molecular genetics is reviewed as well as foci of ALS variants as they occur in localized areas in various parts of the world. There is a discussion of large and small area geographical clustering and the review concludes by presenting a general view of the possible significance of these--at times--confusing pointers in the context of other current theories of the aetiology of ALS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14660820050515061

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitchell, J.
Venue
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Other Motor Neuron Disorders
Published
2000-01
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
235-250
ISSN
1466-0822
Cited by
57
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review